From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: delayed allocation i_blocks fix for stat(2)
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:11:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4872BEAC.7010007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215473799.6702.9.camel@mingming-laptop>
Mingming Cao wrote:
> ext4: delayed allocation i_blocks fix for stat(2)
>
> From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
>
> Right now i_blocks is not getting updated until the disks are actually
> allocaed on disk. This means with delayed allocation, right after files
> are copied, "ls -sF" shoes the file as taking 0 blocks on disk. "du"
> also shows the files taking zero space, which is highly confusing to the user.
>
> Since current delayed allocation already keep track of per-inode total number
> of blocks that are subject to delayed allocation, this patch fix this by using
> that to adjust the value returned by stat(2). When real block allocation
> is done, the i_blocks will get updated. Since the reserved blocks for delayed
> allocation will be decreased, this will be keep value returned by stat(2)
> consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Thanks Mingming, looks like just the right approach.
Something about the spinlock for every stat seems heavy-handed to me but
I'll have to give that more thought. :)
-Eric
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 ++
> fs/ext4/file.c | 1 +
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc9/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc9.orig/fs/ext4/ext4.h 2008-07-07 16:29:23.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc9/fs/ext4/ext4.h 2008-07-07 16:32:54.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1059,6 +1059,8 @@ int ext4_get_blocks_handle(handle_t *han
> extern struct inode *ext4_iget(struct super_block *, unsigned long);
> extern int ext4_write_inode (struct inode *, int);
> extern int ext4_setattr (struct dentry *, struct iattr *);
> +extern int ext4_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
> + struct kstat *stat);
> extern void ext4_delete_inode (struct inode *);
> extern int ext4_sync_inode (handle_t *, struct inode *);
> extern void ext4_discard_reservation (struct inode *);
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc9/fs/ext4/file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc9.orig/fs/ext4/file.c 2008-07-07 16:29:21.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc9/fs/ext4/file.c 2008-07-07 16:29:51.000000000 -0700
> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ const struct file_operations ext4_file_o
> const struct inode_operations ext4_file_inode_operations = {
> .truncate = ext4_truncate,
> .setattr = ext4_setattr,
> + .getattr = ext4_getattr,
> #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4DEV_FS_XATTR
> .setxattr = generic_setxattr,
> .getxattr = generic_getxattr,
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc9/fs/ext4/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc9.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c 2008-07-07 16:29:22.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc9/fs/ext4/inode.c 2008-07-07 16:31:13.000000000 -0700
> @@ -4203,6 +4203,32 @@ err_out:
> return error;
> }
>
> +int ext4_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
> + struct kstat *stat)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode;
> + unsigned long delalloc_blocks;
> +
> + inode = dentry->d_inode;
> + generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
> +
> + /*
> + * We can't update i_blocks if the block allocation is delayed
> + * otherwise in the case of system crash before the real block
> + * allocation is done, we will have i_blocks inconsistent with
> + * on-disk file blocks.
> + * We always keep i_blocks updated together with real
> + * allocation. But to not confuse with user, stat
> + * will return the blocks that include the delayed allocation
> + * blocks for this file.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> + delalloc_blocks = EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks;
> + spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> +
> + stat->blocks += (delalloc_blocks << inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits)>>9;
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> /*
> * How many blocks doth make a writepage()?
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-08 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 23:36 [PATCH] ext4: delayed allocation i_blocks fix for stat(2) Mingming Cao
2008-07-07 23:47 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-08 1:11 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-07-08 12:15 ` Peter Staubach
2008-07-08 20:02 ` Jan Kara
2008-07-08 22:55 ` Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4872BEAC.7010007@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox