From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] FS_MBCACHE: don't needlessly make it built-in
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:20:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A8EA65.9090204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080817190431.GG4199@webber.adilger.int>
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Aug 03, 2008 21:43 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Assume you have:
>> - one or more of ext2/3/4 statically built into your kernel
>> - none of these with extended attributes enabled and
>> - want to add onother one of ext2/3/4 modular and with
>> extended attributes enabled
>>
>> then you currently have to reboot to use it since this results in
>> CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE=y.
>>
>> That's not a common issue, but I just ran into it and since there's no
>> reason to get a built-in mbcache in this case this patch fixes it.
>
> To be honest, I'd like an option to disable MBCACHE entirely. This
> code is of no use if the EAs on an inode are not identical (i.e. if
> anything other than ACLs are in use)
or selinux....
> and is also not useful if the
> xattrs fit into the large inodes in ext4 (and ext3 if the filesystem
> is formatted with this option).
... which is now the default.
a config option sounds reasonable to me, too. I think by the time EAs
spill out of the inode, the chance of them being identical is pretty
small? (i.e. a single acl set, or selinux context may be common, but if
you have enough to not fit in the inode it's more likely to be a
mishmash of things?)
-Eric
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-18 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-03 18:43 [2.6 patch] FS_MBCACHE: don't needlessly make it built-in Adrian Bunk
2008-08-17 19:04 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-08-18 3:20 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A8EA65.9090204@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox