From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/3 BUG,RFC] release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:06:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492BB21E.5000502@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081125073224.GI20928@mit.edu>
Ted-san,
Thanks for your applying.
Theodore Tso wrote:
> Okajima-san,
>
> I've added your patches to the ext4 patch queue for testing. I did
> make some changes to the commit descriptions for clarity's sake
>
> -------------------------
> vfs: add releasepages hooks to block devices which can be used by file systems
<SNIP>
> -------------------------
> ext3: provide function to release journal heads under memory pressure
<SNIP>
> -------------------------
> ext4: implement release_metadata to release private data under memory pressure
<SNIP>
> ----------------------
>
> Also, in the 2nd and 3rd patches, I made change to the comment
> describing ext[34]_release_metadata. It now reads:
>
> /*
> * Try to release metadata pages (indirect blocks, directories) which are
> * mapped via the block device. Since these pages could have journal heads
> * which would prevent try_to_free_buffers() from freeing them, we must use
> * jbd[2] layer's try_to_free_buffers() function to release them.
> */
>
> I hope you agree these changes are more descriptive of what is going
> on in the patch.
OK!
I agree to your all appropriate changes.
(I am looking forward to merging them to mainstream kernel early. :-))
Best regards,
Toshiyuki Okajima
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-20 0:27 [RESEND][PATCH 0/3 BUG,RFC] release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-24 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-25 6:13 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-25 6:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-25 6:22 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-25 7:32 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-25 8:06 ` Toshiyuki Okajima [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492BB21E.5000502@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@MIT.EDU \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).