From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext4: remove ext4_new_meta_block()
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:30:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493C78C5.8080805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228678434-14707-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> There were only two one callers of the function ext4_new_meta_block(),
> which just a very simpler wrapper function around
> ext4_new_meta_blocks(). Change those two functions to call
> ext4_new_meta_blocks() directly, to save code and stack space usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Looks like a good idea to me.
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/balloc.c | 17 -----------------
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 --
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 3 ++-
> fs/ext4/xattr.c | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index 02e8ce4..47cf25d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -724,23 +724,6 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * ext4_new_meta_block() -- allocate block for meta data (indexing) blocks
> - *
> - * @handle: handle to this transaction
> - * @inode: file inode
> - * @goal: given target block(filesystem wide)
> - * @errp: error code
> - *
> - * Return allocated block number on success
> - */
> -ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_meta_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> - ext4_fsblk_t goal, int *errp)
> -{
> - unsigned long count = 1;
> - return ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle, inode, goal, &count, errp);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * ext4_count_free_blocks() -- count filesystem free blocks
> * @sb: superblock
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 74cb395..ac8551e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -998,8 +998,6 @@ extern ext4_grpblk_t ext4_block_group_offset(struct super_block *sb,
> extern int ext4_bg_has_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group);
> extern unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb(struct super_block *sb,
> ext4_group_t group);
> -extern ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_meta_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> - ext4_fsblk_t goal, int *errp);
> extern ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> ext4_fsblk_t goal, unsigned long *count, int *errp);
> extern int ext4_claim_free_blocks(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, s64 nblocks);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index ea2ce3c..e5b169b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -189,9 +189,10 @@ ext4_ext_new_meta_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> struct ext4_extent *ex, int *err)
> {
> ext4_fsblk_t goal, newblock;
> + unsigned long count = 1;
>
> goal = ext4_ext_find_goal(inode, path, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block));
> - newblock = ext4_new_meta_block(handle, inode, goal, err);
> + newblock = ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle, inode, goal, &count, err);
> return newblock;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> index 80626d5..f896e2c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> @@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ ext4_xattr_block_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
> struct ext4_xattr_block_find *bs)
> {
> + unsigned long count = 1;
> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> struct buffer_head *new_bh = NULL;
> struct ext4_xattr_search *s = &bs->s;
> @@ -810,8 +811,8 @@ inserted:
> /* We need to allocate a new block */
> ext4_fsblk_t goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb,
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_group);
> - ext4_fsblk_t block = ext4_new_meta_block(handle, inode,
> - goal, &error);
> + ext4_fsblk_t block = ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle, inode,
> + goal, &count, &error);
> if (error)
> goto cleanup;
> ea_idebug(inode, "creating block %d", block);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-08 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-07 19:33 [PATCH, RFC] ext4: remove ext4_new_blocks() and call ext4_mb_new_blocks() directly Theodore Ts'o
2008-12-07 19:33 ` [PATCH, RFC] ext4: remove ext4_new_meta_block() Theodore Ts'o
2008-12-07 19:33 ` [PATCH, RFC] ext4: remove do_blk_alloc() Theodore Ts'o
2008-12-08 1:30 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-12-08 8:23 ` [PATCH, RFC] ext4: remove ext4_new_blocks() and call ext4_mb_new_blocks() directly Shen Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493C78C5.8080805@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).