From: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add checks to validate extent entries.
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:40:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49900818.8010700@ph.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209103158.GD31884@skywalker>
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
>> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> This patch adds check to validate the extent entries along
>>> with extent headers. Should handle crash with corrupt filesystem.
>> While your patch probably decreases the average number of checks that
>> are done, it makes single random accesses quite expensive since always
>> complete extent blocks are checked at once, even if just a single pblock
>> is accessed. No idea whether there are workloads which have that as a
>> typical access pattern...
>
> The second patch make sure we do it only when we read the extent
> information from the disk.
Imagine a random read of 4k somewhere inside a very large file. With
your patch, we will loop over several kilobytes of extent tables just
for that single read. (The second read will be faster, of course, but
who knows whether there will be a second read?) So I think there exist
some access patterns, for which your patch slows down things
considerably, but I cannot judge whether these are important.
Kind regards,
Thiemo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-07 15:36 [PATCH] introduce range check for extent pblock references Thiemo Nagel
2009-02-07 17:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-07 18:49 ` Thiemo Nagel
2009-02-07 19:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-07 20:01 ` [PATCH] Add checks to validate extent entries Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-07 20:01 ` [PATCH] Validate extent details only when read from the disk Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-09 10:31 ` Thiemo Nagel
2009-02-09 10:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-09 11:12 ` Thiemo Nagel
2009-02-09 10:26 ` [PATCH] Add checks to validate extent entries Thiemo Nagel
2009-02-09 10:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-02-09 10:40 ` Thiemo Nagel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49900818.8010700@ph.tum.de \
--to=thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).