Re: EXT4 ENOSPC Bug

[Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>]

Hi All,

On 02/17/2009 06:36 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 02/16/2009 08:00 PM, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 04:27:03PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> So, yes, seems to be an inode allocation problem.
>> I'm pretty sure the ENOSPC problem which you both found is an inode
>> allocation problem. Some of you seem to have an easier time
>> reproducing it than others; could you try this patch, and periodically
>> scan your system logs for the message "ext4: find_group_flex failed,
>> fallback succeeded"? If the problem goes away for you, and you find
>> the occasional aforemention message in your system log, that will
>> confirm what I suspect, which is the bug is in fs/ext4/inode.c's
>> find_group_flex() function. (If I'm wrong, the fallback code will
>> activate only when the filesystem is genuinely out of inodes, which
>> should be very rare.)
>> More comments are in the patch header. My current long-term plan for
>> dealing with this is to enhance find_group_orlov() to and
>> find_group_other() to understand about flex_bg's.
> Ok. I am now running with the patch enabled on two machines - but as the
> issue occured only 2 times in nearly 2 months on two machines...
Didn't take that long:
On one of the machines I got several thousand of:

[10379.575904] ext4: find_group_flex failed, fallback succeeded dir 416319
[10379.576002] ext4: find_group_flex failed, fallback succeeded dir 416319
[10379.579981] ext4: find_group_flex failed, fallback succeeded dir 416319
[10379.580097] ext4: find_group_flex failed, fallback succeeded dir 416319
(with different directories)

No userspace visible behaviour.

So it seems you were right. It seems sensible to put that patch without 
printk in the kernel until the issue is fully solved...


Andres