From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Properly initialize the buffer_head state
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 10:20:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A02FC3A.9000806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241692770-22547-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> These buffer_heads are allocated on stack and are
> used only to make get_blocks calls. So we can set the
> b_state to 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I'd noticed this too, thanks for fixing up.
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 1 +
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
> fs/mpage.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index e963870..10b3028 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -3141,6 +3141,7 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct inode *inode, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> break;
> }
> + map_bh.b_state = 0;
> ret = ext4_get_blocks_wrap(handle, inode, block,
> max_blocks, &map_bh,
> EXT4_CREATE_UNINITIALIZED_EXT, 0, 0);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 43884e3..c3cd00f 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2104,7 +2104,7 @@ static int mpage_da_map_blocks(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
> if ((mpd->b_state & (1 << BH_Mapped)) &&
> !(mpd->b_state & (1 << BH_Delay)))
> return 0;
> - new.b_state = mpd->b_state;
> + new.b_state = 0;
hm can you explain why we want 0 rather than mpd->b_state? The others
are obvious, b_state was largely uninitialized, but this is changing
what looked like a different intentional initialization. Can you update
the changelog to say why it's wrong?
While we're at it could we name this something other than "new?"
If it's a mapping bh, maybe "map_bh" like normal? :)
> new.b_blocknr = 0;
> new.b_size = mpd->b_size;
> next = mpd->b_blocknr;
> diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
> index 680ba60..cd98409 100644
> --- a/fs/mpage.c
> +++ b/fs/mpage.c
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ int mpage_readpage(struct page *page, get_block_t get_block)
> struct buffer_head map_bh;
> unsigned long first_logical_block = 0;
>
> - clear_buffer_mapped(&map_bh);
> + map_bh.b_state = 0;
> bio = do_mpage_readpage(bio, page, 1, &last_block_in_bio,
> &map_bh, &first_logical_block, get_block);
> if (bio)
the rest looks good to me; there are places in the core kernel that
don't initialize state and just clear flags they "know" they'll care
about... it always struck me as messy, clearing state is much much better.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 10:39 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Properly initialize the buffer_head state Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-07 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: Clear the unwritten buffer_head flag properly Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-07 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] vfs: Add BUG_ON for delayed and unwritten extents in submit_bh Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-07 15:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-12 3:17 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-12 4:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] vfs: Add BUG_ON for delayed and unwritten extentsin submit_bh Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-12 13:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-07 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: Clear the unwritten buffer_head flag properly Eric Sandeen
2009-05-08 8:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-12 3:08 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-12 4:46 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-13 18:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-13 22:28 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-14 6:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-14 5:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-14 13:14 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-07 15:20 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-05-10 23:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Properly initialize the buffer_head state Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 9:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-11 11:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 14:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-12 3:17 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-12 4:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A02FC3A.9000806@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).