From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUG] ext4: dx_map_entry cannot support over 64KB block size
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:32:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A404CC0.9050202@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090622024757.GB26079@mit.edu>
Ted-san,
Theodore Tso wrote:
> Are you aware of any patches that enable an IA64 system to support a
> page size greater than 64kB? (And whether any customer would actually
> want to use them, given the downsides of very large page size?) The
No, I am not. But I have considered that POWERPC system has been
supported over 64KB page size after I examined all Kconfig's in kernel
source. Therefore I thought this bug should be fixed in kernel side.
> issue is that Linux doesn't support filesystem block sizes > than the
> page size. In any case, I don't mind adding patches that attempt to
> make it better to support large block sizes; I don't really want to
> claim that we support it until we can actually fully test for that
I think so, too.
> feature, though. Is it your intent to actually try to provide support
> for this at some point? I'll help you if you are, but you'll have to
> do the testing, since I don't have access to an IA64 platform that
> might be able to support these sorts of large pages.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Ted
I don't think this feature (over 64KB block size support) to be necessary
immediately. Because I have been investigating ext4 for my customers
in order that I may provide them greater quality and performance but they don't
want it now.
But when my customers want this feature, I will try to test it.
Best regards,
Toshiyuki Okajima
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 7:50 [PATCH][BUG] ext4: dx_map_entry cannot support over 64KB block size Toshiyuki Okajima
2009-06-05 21:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-06-08 7:30 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2009-06-21 3:57 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-22 1:46 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2009-06-22 2:47 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-23 3:32 ` Toshiyuki Okajima [this message]
2009-06-23 15:28 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-08 13:31 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A404CC0.9050202@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).