linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUG] ext4: dx_map_entry cannot support over 64KB block size
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:32:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A404CC0.9050202@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090622024757.GB26079@mit.edu>

Ted-san,

Theodore Tso wrote:
 > Are you aware of any patches that enable an IA64 system to support a
 > page size greater than 64kB?  (And whether any customer would actually
 > want to use them, given the downsides of very large page size?)  The
No, I am not. But I have considered that POWERPC system has been
supported over 64KB page size after I examined all Kconfig's in kernel
source. Therefore I thought this bug should be fixed in kernel side.

 > issue is that Linux doesn't support filesystem block sizes > than the
 > page size.  In any case, I don't mind adding patches that attempt to
 > make it better to support large block sizes; I don't really want to
 > claim that we support it until we can actually fully test for that
I think so, too.

 > feature, though.  Is it your intent to actually try to provide support
 > for this at some point?  I'll help you if you are, but you'll have to
 > do the testing, since I don't have access to an IA64 platform that
 > might be able to support these sorts of large pages.
 >
 > Thanks,
 >
 > 						- Ted
I don't think this feature (over 64KB block size support) to be necessary
immediately. Because I have been investigating ext4 for my customers
in order that I may provide them greater quality and performance but they don't
  want it now.
But when my customers want this feature, I will try to test it.

Best regards,
Toshiyuki Okajima


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-05  7:50 [PATCH][BUG] ext4: dx_map_entry cannot support over 64KB block size Toshiyuki Okajima
2009-06-05 21:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-06-08  7:30   ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2009-06-21  3:57     ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-22  1:46       ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2009-06-22  2:47         ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-23  3:32           ` Toshiyuki Okajima [this message]
2009-06-23 15:28             ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-08 13:31   ` Theodore Tso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A404CC0.9050202@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).