From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:32:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4A94ACDF.30405@redhat.com> References: <82k50tjw7u.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <20090824130125.GG23677@mit.edu> <20090824195159.GD29763@elf.ucw.cz> <4A92F6FC.4060907@redhat.com> <20090824205209.GE29763@elf.ucw.cz> <4A930160.8060508@redhat.com> <20090824212518.GF29763@elf.ucw.cz> <20090824223915.GI17684@mit.edu> <20090824230036.GK29763@elf.ucw.cz> <4A932B18.1020209@redhat.com> <20090825093414.GB15563@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ric Wheeler , Theodore Tso , Florian Weimer , Goswin von Brederlow , Rob Landley , kernel list , Andrew Morton , mtk.manpages@gmail.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net To: Pavel Machek Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090825093414.GB15563@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: >> So, would you be happy if ext3 fsck was always run on reboot (at least >> for flash devices)? > > For flash devices, MD Raid 5 and anything else that needs it; yes that > would make me happy ;-). Sorry, but that just shows your naivete. Metadata takes up such a small part of the disk that fscking it and finding it to be OK is absolutely no guarantee that the data on the filesystem has not been horribly mangled. Personally, what I care about is my data. The metadata is just a way to get to my data, while the data is actually important. -- All rights reversed.