From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] e2fsck: avoid overflow in pass5 check_block_end()
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:40:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9DA2DC.10001@redhat.com> (raw)
When making a filesystem as in:
mke2fs -E lazy_itable_init=1 -O uninit_bg -b 4096 bigfile 4294967298
a subsequent fsck would result in:
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Internal error: fudging end of bitmap (3)
e2fsck: aborted
This is because check_block_end() was overflowing in the calculation
for "end", and giving it a value of -1 (0xFFFF....) which eventually
ended up tripping up a test in ext2fs_fudge_generic_bmap_end,
if (end > bitmap->real_end)
return neq;
Fix another such error in read_bitmaps() as well.
lib/ext2fs/imager.c likely has similar problems but it looks like
it has no 64-bit treatment at all yet.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
Applies to pu branch.
Index: e2fsprogs/e2fsck/pass5.c
===================================================================
--- e2fsprogs.orig/e2fsck/pass5.c
+++ e2fsprogs/e2fsck/pass5.c
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static void check_block_end(e2fsck_t ctx
clear_problem_context(&pctx);
end = ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_start2(fs->block_map) +
- (EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super) * fs->group_desc_count) - 1;
+ ((blk64_t)EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super) * fs->group_desc_count) - 1;
pctx.errcode = ext2fs_fudge_block_bitmap_end2(fs->block_map, end,
&save_blocks_count);
if (pctx.errcode) {
Index: e2fsprogs/lib/ext2fs/rw_bitmaps.c
===================================================================
--- e2fsprogs.orig/lib/ext2fs/rw_bitmaps.c
+++ e2fsprogs/lib/ext2fs/rw_bitmaps.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static errcode_t read_bitmaps(ext2_filsy
}
blk = (fs->image_header->offset_blockmap /
fs->blocksize);
- blk_cnt = EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super) *
+ blk_cnt = (blk64_t)EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super) *
fs->group_desc_count;
while (block_nbytes > 0) {
retval = io_channel_read_blk64(fs->image_io, blk++,
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-01 22:40 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-09-06 17:57 ` [PATCH] e2fsck: avoid overflow in pass5 check_block_end() Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9DA2DC.10001@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).