From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() to use access functions.
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:51:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9F4B57.9080602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12386.1251948115@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Nick Dokos wrote:
> Following Andreas's suggestion, I found that ext2fs_set_gdt_csum()
> was the culprit: it used an ext2_group_desc pointer to access/set
> fields and it did that directly, not through access functions.
>
> I'm testing the patch now, but it'll take a while, so again I'm sending
> it out for comments and to possibly try out. Even if it checks out, it
> will need some additional care once the flags situation settles down.
cool, thanks.
yep this would explain the bug (any direct access would I guess)
With this on top of my patch stack, my testcase passes, until I allocate
something high enough that I run into yet another 32-bit overflow
somewhere ;)
Ted, want me to collate these into a proper patch series? I have one
more direct access fix as well. (and then things like ext2ed & e2imgge
etc all need a thorough going-over too....)
We really must make these structs opaque or something or it will be
endless pain...
Minor comments below.
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> From 6a3b83cda1bcd1e3594515ee888f175bf5cc7906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:00:23 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() to use access functions.
>
> Replace all field accesses with calls to access functions.
> Most importantly, get rid of the mis-declared group descriptor
> pointer which caused the wrong fields to be updated.
Not quite sure what you mean by this? It worked ok for the "old" size ...
> Signed-off-by: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
> ---
> lib/ext2fs/csum.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/csum.c b/lib/ext2fs/csum.c
> index a0f25e3..def3ddd 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/csum.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/csum.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,6 @@ static __u32 find_last_inode_ingrp(ext2fs_inode_bitmap bitmap,
> errcode_t ext2fs_set_gdt_csum(ext2_filsys fs)
> {
> struct ext2_super_block *sb = fs->super;
> - struct ext2_group_desc *bg = fs->group_desc;
> int dirty = 0;
> dgrp_t i;
>
> @@ -116,27 +115,32 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_set_gdt_csum(ext2_filsys fs)
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM))
> return 0;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < fs->group_desc_count; i++, bg++) {
> - int old_csum = bg->bg_checksum;
> - int old_unused = bg->bg_itable_unused;
> - int old_flags = bg->bg_flags;
> + for (i = 0; i < fs->group_desc_count; i++) {
> + unsigned int old_csum = ext2fs_bg_checksum(fs, i);
> + int old_unused = ext2fs_bg_itable_unused(fs, i);
whitespace problem here, use tabs
> + unsigned int old_flags = ext2fs_bg_flags(fs, i);
> + int old_free_inodes_count = ext2fs_bg_free_inodes_count(fs, i);
ditto
also, strictly, csum & flags are 16 bits, unused is (today) 64 bits ....
> +
extra blank line?
>
> - if (bg->bg_free_inodes_count == sb->s_inodes_per_group) {
> - bg->bg_flags |= EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT;
> - bg->bg_itable_unused = sb->s_inodes_per_group;
> + if (old_free_inodes_count == sb->s_inodes_per_group) {
> + ext2fs_bg_flags_set(fs, i, old_flags | EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
better this I think (though I guess it may change ...):
+ ext2fs_bg_flag_set(fs, i, EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
> + ext2fs_bg_itable_unused_set(fs, i, sb->s_inodes_per_group);
> } else {
> - bg->bg_flags &= ~EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT;
> - bg->bg_itable_unused = sb->s_inodes_per_group -
> + int unused = sb->s_inodes_per_group -
> find_last_inode_ingrp(fs->inode_map,
> sb->s_inodes_per_group,i);
> +
> + ext2fs_bg_flags_set(fs, i, old_flags & ~EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
and this:
+ ext2fs_flag_clear(fs, i, EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
> +
> + ext2fs_bg_itable_unused_set(fs, i, unused);
> }
>
> ext2fs_group_desc_csum_set(fs, i);
> - if (old_flags != bg->bg_flags)
> + if (old_flags != ext2fs_bg_flags(fs, i))
> dirty = 1;
> - if (old_unused != bg->bg_itable_unused)
> + if (old_unused != ext2fs_bg_itable_unused(fs, i))
> dirty = 1;
> - if (old_csum != bg->bg_checksum)
> + if (old_csum != ext2fs_bg_checksum(fs, i))
> dirty = 1;
> }
> if (dirty)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 3:21 [PATCH] Fix ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() to use access functions Nick Dokos
2009-09-03 4:51 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-09-03 5:11 ` Nick Dokos
2009-09-03 5:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-09-03 18:16 ` Justin Maggard
2009-09-03 5:21 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-03 5:22 Nick Dokos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9F4B57.9080602@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=jmaggard10@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).