linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Surbhi Palande <surbhi.palande@canonical.com>
To: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replaced BUG() with return -EIO	from	ext4_ext_get_blocks
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:11:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B22C393.2090709@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260562923.21896.11.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com>

Hi Frank,

Frank Mayhar wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:02 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>   
>> My first thought was that this was a bandaid too, but I guess it can
>> come about due to on-disk corruption for any reason, so it should
>> be handled gracefully, and I suppose this approach seems fine.
>>     
>
> That's why we've been running with it, yes.
>
>   
>> Since this is catching on-disk corruption, though, it'd be better to call
>> ext4_error() and let the mount-time error-handling policy decide what to do.
>>
>> I like having more info but below seems awfully wordy ;)  Maybe the first
>> printk would suffice, and switching it to an ext4_error() would be best,
>> I think.
>>     
>
> Okay, I'll rework the patch a bit and resubmit it.
>   
Since I published this patch first against a reported upstream bug, I
will work on the comments and resubmit the patch!

Thanks for your comments !

Warm Regards,
Surbhi.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-11 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-11 14:06 [PATCH] replaced BUG() with return -EIO from ext4_ext_get_blocks Surbhi Palande
2009-12-11 18:07 ` Frank Mayhar
2009-12-11 20:02   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-12-11 20:22     ` Frank Mayhar
2009-12-11 20:31       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-12-11 21:11         ` Frank Mayhar
2009-12-11 22:11       ` Surbhi Palande [this message]
2009-12-11 22:16         ` Frank Mayhar
2009-12-12 21:00     ` [PATCH v2] " Surbhi Palande
2009-12-14 15:04       ` tytso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B22C393.2090709@canonical.com \
    --to=surbhi.palande@canonical.com \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).