From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger@sun.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: return correct wbc.nr_to_write in ext4_da_writepages
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:40:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B2A50E9.4010806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261063063.4882.38.camel@castor>
Richard Kennedy wrote:
> ext4: always re-base nr_to_write in ext4_da_writepages
>
> When ext4_da_writepages increases the nr_to_write in writeback_control
> then it must always re-base the return value.
>
> Without this change, when wb_writeback calculates how many pages were
> actually written it can get a negative value and loop more times than
> necessary. In tests I have seen nearly all the dirty pages pushed out to
> writeback due to this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
>
> ----
>
> patch against 2.6.32
> tested on x86_64
>
> wb_writeback calculates (MAX_WRITE_PAGES - nr_to_write) & cannot know
> that the value got changed.
>
> I'm not sure what the test I removed was for.
> Perhaps
> if (nr_to_writebump)
> wbc->nr_to_write -= nr_to_writebump;
> was intended?
Ted's commit 55138e0b added it (just part of the commit):
@@ -2914,7 +2994,8 @@ retry:
out_writepages:
if (!no_nrwrite_index_update)
wbc->no_nrwrite_index_update = 0;
- wbc->nr_to_write -= nr_to_writebump;
+ if (wbc->nr_to_write > nr_to_writebump)
+ wbc->nr_to_write -= nr_to_writebump;
wbc->range_start = range_start;
trace_ext4_da_writepages_result(inode, wbc, ret, pages_written);
return ret;
so it looks like the intent there was to stop ->nr_to_write from
going negative ...
> regards
> Richard
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 2c8caa5..52a573c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2999,8 +2999,7 @@ retry:
> out_writepages:
> if (!no_nrwrite_index_update)
> wbc->no_nrwrite_index_update = 0;
> - if (wbc->nr_to_write > nr_to_writebump)
> - wbc->nr_to_write -= nr_to_writebump;
> + wbc->nr_to_write -= nr_to_writebump;
> wbc->range_start = range_start;
> trace_ext4_da_writepages_result(inode, wbc, ret, pages_written);
> return ret;
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 15:17 [PATCH] ext4: return correct wbc.nr_to_write in ext4_da_writepages Richard Kennedy
2009-12-17 15:40 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-12-17 15:58 ` Richard Kennedy
2009-12-17 17:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-12-25 20:10 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B2A50E9.4010806@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).