linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] xfstests: add another fallocate test to 214
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:18:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B427731.9080801@redhat.com> (raw)

ext4 had a regression where it double-accounted used blocks
if you fallocated on top of delalloc blocks.  Ted sent a
c program to exploit it (see "fsstress-induced corruption reproduced"
on linux-ext4 on 12/31/2009) and it's trivial to do the same thing
within the xfstests framework using xfs_io.

This also changes the handcrafted xfs_io tests to use the
_require_xfs_io_falloc helper, not sure how that got missed.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/214 b/214
index 98cfc3a..35ec2cb 100755
--- a/214
+++ b/214
@@ -52,14 +52,7 @@ _supported_os Linux
 
 rm -f $seq.full
 
-testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -c "falloc 0 1m" $TEST_DIR/$tmp.io 2>&1`
-
-# Old xfs_io doesn't have fallocate support
-echo $testio | grep -q "not found" && \
-	_notrun "xfs_io fallocate support is missing"
-# Old glibc, old kernels, and some filesystems don't have fallocate support
-echo $testio | grep -q "Operation not supported" && \
-	_notrun "xfs_io fallocate command failed (old kernel? wrong fs?)"
+_require_xfs_io_falloc
 
 # Ok, off we go.
 
@@ -126,6 +119,20 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -d				\
 
 rm -f $TEST_DIR/ouch
 
+# Reported by Ted Ts'o on linux-ext4, 12/31/2009
+# double-allocation on ext4 when fallocating over delalloc blocks
+# Regression due to d21cd8f163ac44b15c465aab7306db931c606908
+
+echo "=== delalloc write 16k; fallocate same range ==="
+# delalloc write 16k, fallocate same range.
+# Should get caught on fsck when we're done.
+
+$XFS_IO_PROG -F -f				\
+	-c "pwrite 0 16k"			\
+	-c "falloc 0 16k"			\
+	-c "fsync"				\
+	$TEST_DIR/ouch2 | _filter_xfs_io_unique
+
 # success, all done
 status=0
 exit


             reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-04 23:18 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-01-06 16:49 ` [PATCH] xfstests: add another fallocate test to 214 Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B427731.9080801@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).