From: Surbhi Palande <surbhi.palande@canonical.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: ext4 performance benchmarks
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:59:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B56B7FD.4080506@canonical.com> (raw)
Hi Guys,
The following article says that ext4 performance has plummeted
since the 2.6.31 kernel. Can someone please comment on this?
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_then_now&num=1
Are large reads giving a lower performance for the kernels post 2.6.30?
Is this performance attributed to some particular ext4 features/patches?
Does anyone maintain the benchmarking results for ext4 after any
feature/big patches are applied?
Thanks !
Warm Regards,
Surbhi.
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 7:59 Surbhi Palande [this message]
2010-01-20 19:01 ` ext4 performance benchmarks Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B56B7FD.4080506@canonical.com \
--to=surbhi.palande@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).