From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] default max mount count to unused
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:37:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B591D80.6010309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100122012929.GA21263@thunk.org>
tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:37:25PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> From: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
>>
>> Anaconda has been setting the max mount count on the root fs
>> to -1 (unused) for ages.
>>
>> I (Eric) tend to agree that using mount count as a proxy for potential
>> for corruption seems odd. And waiting for fsck on a reboot just because
>> it's number 20 (or so) is painful. Can we just turn it off by default?
>>
>> I wouldn't mind killing the periodic check as well, but consider
>> this a trial balloon. :)
>
> I think it would be better to make this be something tunable via
> mke2fs.conf.
And defaulting it to unused, right ;)
> And as a profile option, maybe we would want this to be
> something where we periodically force a full fsck check and then send
> TRIM commands down to the SSD. Given the size and speed of SSD's,
> doing periodic TRIM's every N mounts mike actually be a good thing.
> (It's dangerous to do a TRIM without doing a full fsck since if the
> block allocation bitmap isn't quite right, the user could lose data.)
That sounds fine, as do mke2fs.conf hooks, as does a nice shipped script
to do background checking of snapshots.
But I still don't know why "You mounted your fs 20 times" is a good
proxy for "you had better check for corruption now." Have we so
little faith? :)
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-22 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 22:37 [PATCH] default max mount count to unused Eric Sandeen
2010-01-22 0:22 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-01-22 1:37 ` tytso
2010-01-22 17:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-22 18:35 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-01-22 1:29 ` tytso
2010-01-22 3:37 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-01-22 8:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-01-22 17:02 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-01-22 18:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-01-22 18:57 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-01-22 19:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-01-22 19:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-22 20:58 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-01-22 23:18 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B591D80.6010309@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notting@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).