linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] ext4: unmap the underlying metadata when allocating blocks via fallocate
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:43:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5DBC15.9030004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100125090243.GA28459@thunk.org>

tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:42:05AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
>> My goal was to see if we can drop the BH_New flag when returning
>> preallocated blocks. But now i look at it again i guess you don't need
>> to take this patch. We cannot unmap underlying meta data during
>> fallocate because even if we remove the old mapping for the blocks,
>> we could reboot and later somebody(e2fsprogs) can directly read the blocks
>> and create a bh with old data. So i guess we should be doing
>> unmap_underlying_blocks when we are returning blocks to userspace or
>> when we actually zero out blocks.
> 
> OK, so I'll drop this patch from the patch queue, and will do a full
> test run (XFSQA -g auto using both 1k and 4k block sizes) of the
> following patches:
> 
> Aneesh Kumar K.V (3):
>       ext4: Handle -EDQUOT error on write
>       ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate
>       ext4: Drop EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE flag

You may wish to add the patch from Jiaying (via me) as well, to handle
the blocks-past-eof case, if it's had sufficient review.

-Eric

> Of all of the patches in the ext4 patch queue, these seem to be the
> ones which need to be urgently pushed to Linus before 2.6.33.
> 
> Any objections, or nominations for other patches that should go in
> before 2.6.33, please speak up now...
> 
> 						- Ted


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-25 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06 19:22 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-01-06 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: Drop EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE flag Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-01-06 19:50   ` Mingming
2010-01-06 19:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: unmap the underlying metadata when allocating blocks via fallocate Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-01-06 20:20   ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-14 17:00   ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-14 18:30     ` [PATCH -V2] " Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-14 19:31       ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-24 18:24       ` tytso
2010-01-25  5:12         ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-25  9:02           ` tytso
2010-01-25 15:43             ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-01-25 17:55               ` tytso
2010-01-25 18:21                 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-06 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate Mingming
2010-01-13 14:55 ` [PATCH -V2] " Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B5DBC15.9030004@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).