From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Should journaled quota be default for ext4? Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:30:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4BAC3860.7010905@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ext4 development Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41676 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752074Ab0CZEa3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:30:29 -0400 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2Q4UT4U014612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:30:29 -0400 Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2Q4UOVr000624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:30:28 -0400 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ted's email about quotacheck made me think: Is there a reason that journaled quota is not default for ext4? (or ext3 for that matter, but we're not messing with that now) IOW - if we do mount -o quota, is there any reason that we should also need more options to journal that quota? When would we not want journaled quota? (Forgive me if it's a dumb question, I'm not as well versed in extN quota as I probably should be). -Eric