From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@oracle.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FIEMAP sometimes returns bad information for delalloc extents
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:35:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAE4FE5.7020004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB0601D5-963C-4017-B7EA-A3764D2067EF@oracle.com>
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-03-27, at 09:07, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> I was monitoring the progress of a distributed download program, and saw
>> the following output from two runs of filefrag taken a few seconds
>> apart:
>>
>> 8 790 8825663 8825551 65
>> 9 855 0 8825727 319 unknown,delalloc
>> 10 1174 8798367 318 128
>>
>> 7 790 8825663 8825559 69
>> 8 1174 8798367 8825731 128
>>
>> The length of the delalloc extent, 319, is bogus. The 319 seems to come
>> from 1174 - 855. But it's not actually the number of delayed
>> allocation blocks, as we can see when the blocks finally get written;
>> apparently it was only 4 blocks long.
>
> I'm surprised it shows anything at all for delalloc blocks, since AFAIK
> FIEMAP is only walking the extent tree. It would be interesting if it
> walked the VM pagetable for unallocated extents in the file, and beyond
> i_size.
it does this in the callback for ext4_ext_walk_space:
if (newex->ec_type == EXT4_EXT_CACHE_GAP) {
...
page = find_get_page(inode->i_mapping, offset);
...
bh = page_buffers(page);
...
if (buffer_delay(bh)) {
flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC;
...
so it was an attempt, at least, to flag which extents are delalloc.
FWIW, on xfs xfs_bmap initially would cause a file flush, it didn't even ever
try to report delalloc until fiemap came along ...
-Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-27 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-27 15:07 FIEMAP sometimes returns bad information for delalloc extents Theodore Ts'o
2010-03-27 17:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-27 18:35 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BAE4FE5.7020004@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).