From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ext4: don't use quota reservation for speculative metadata blocks
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:28:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBDF610.8030906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sk76tkx9.fsf@openvz.org>
Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Because we can badly over-reserve metadata when we
>> calculate worst-case, it complicates things for quota, since
>> we must reserve and then claim later, retry on EDQUOT, etc.
>> Quota is also a generally smaller pool than fs free blocks,
>> so this over-reservation hurts more, and more often.
>>
>> I'm of the opinion that it's not the worst thing to allow
>> metadata to push a user slightly over quota. This simplifies
>> the code and avoids the false quota rejections that result
>> from worst-case speculation.
> Hm.. Totally agree with issue description. And seem there is no another
> solution except yours.
> ASAIU alloc_nofail is called from places where it is impossible to fail
> an allocation even if something goes wrong.
> I ask because currently i'm working on EIO handling in alloc/free calls.
> I've found that it is useless to fail claim/free procedures because
> caller is unable to handle it properly.
> It is impossible to fail following operation
> ->writepage
> ->dquot_claim_space (what to do if EIO happens?)
Hm, if these start returning EIO then maybe my patch should be modified
to treat EDQUOT differently than EIO ... assuming callers can handle
the return at all.
In other words, make NOFAIL really just mean "don't fail for EDQUOT"
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-08 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 21:45 [PATCH 0/3] ext4: don't use quota reservation for speculative metadata blocks Eric Sandeen
2010-04-07 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] quota: use flags interface for dquot alloc/free space Eric Sandeen
2010-04-12 13:22 ` Jan Kara
2010-05-20 22:29 ` tytso
2010-04-07 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] quota: add the option to not fail with EDQUOT in block allocation Eric Sandeen
2010-04-12 13:23 ` Jan Kara
2010-05-20 22:32 ` tytso
2010-04-07 21:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: don't use quota reservation for speculative metadata blocks Eric Sandeen
2010-04-12 13:36 ` Jan Kara
2010-05-20 23:10 ` tytso
2010-04-08 8:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-08 15:28 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-04-11 9:37 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-12 13:15 ` Jan Kara
2010-04-12 13:22 ` Jan Kara
2010-04-12 13:40 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-12 13:33 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-12 13:37 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-12 13:42 ` tytso
2010-04-12 13:52 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-12 13:55 ` Jan Kara
2010-04-12 14:08 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-12 14:24 ` Jan Kara
2010-04-12 15:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-12 2:20 ` tytso
2010-04-12 14:03 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBDF610.8030906@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).