From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: quota reservation fixes for -stable? Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:37:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4BC8CA8F.1030708@redhat.com> References: <4BB36BEC.2000207@redhat.com> <20100401082334.GD3322@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ext4 development , Dmitry Monakhov To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49464 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932408Ab0DPUhk (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:37:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100401082334.GD3322@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/01/2010 03:23 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > Ah, I'm testing quotas on non-root fs so I was wondering how come people > hit the warning so often. Now I understand :) For root filesystem on ext4 > we don't have a chance to not see this warning. That being said the warning > is pretty useless for ordinary users so I guess we should just hide it > behind #ifdef __DQUOT_PARANOIA and use it for debugging purposes only. > If noone objects soon, I'll do the change. > > Honza Hm, I see this in your tree now, but isn't __DQUOT_PARANOIA defined by default anyway? fs/quota/dquot.c: 1da177e4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 83)#define __DQUOT_PARANOIA -Eric