From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Edward Shishkin <eshishki@redhat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>, Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: Ext4: batched discard support
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:04:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCC9B43.8080805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l2z87f94c371004191058pb88b1b89va325ceffb83ba604@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/19/2010 01:58 PM, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Eric Sandeen<sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Greg Freemyer wrote:
>>> Adding Mark Lord in cc.
>>>
>>> He wrote a preliminary discard solution last summer. I'm not sure how
>>> it has progressed.
>>
>> The difference here is that Mark's stuff wasn't as tightly integrated
>> with the kernel, IIRC. What I saw was more at a user level - make a big
>> file, map it, discard all the blocks, unlink the file.
>>
>> It was a good first step, but I think we can do a lot better by using
>> fs-specific calls to be efficient& targeted about the discards.
>>
>> Christoph has a similar approach for XFS, FWIW.
>>
>> -Eric
>
> I haven't looked closely at this patch, but I recall Mark consolidated
> numerous discontinuous trim/discard/unmap ranges into a single command
> to the SSD drive.
>
> That was why he felt he was getting superior performance. ie. There
> was an overhead per command to the drive that was eliminated if a
> single more complex command with multiple ranges went to the SSD
> drive.
>
> But he's the one that did the work and the benchmarking, so I'll let
> him take it from here, especially if I mis-understood what he was
> doing.
>
> Greg
This work certainly builds on Mark's early results which clearly showed that
several devices see a win from doing larger/batched discards instead of the fine
grained ones.
Thanks!
Ric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 10:55 Ext4: batched discard support Lukas Czerner
2010-04-19 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add ioctl FITRIM Lukas Czerner
2010-04-19 10:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add batched discard support for ext4 Lukas Czerner
2010-04-20 21:21 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-21 2:26 ` Mark Lord
2010-04-21 2:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-21 18:59 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-21 19:04 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-21 19:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-21 20:44 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-21 20:53 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-21 21:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-21 21:03 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-21 21:47 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-21 21:56 ` James Bottomley
2010-04-21 21:59 ` Mark Lord
2010-04-23 8:23 ` Lukas Czerner
2010-04-24 13:24 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-24 13:48 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-24 14:30 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-24 14:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-24 15:03 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-24 17:04 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-24 18:30 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-24 18:41 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-26 14:00 ` Mark Lord
2010-04-26 14:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-04-26 15:27 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-26 15:51 ` Lukas Czerner
2010-04-28 1:25 ` Mark Lord
2010-04-26 15:48 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-24 19:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-04-26 14:03 ` Mark Lord
2010-04-24 18:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-04-26 16:55 ` Jan Kara
2010-04-26 17:46 ` Lukas Czerner
2010-04-26 17:52 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-26 18:14 ` Lukas Czerner
2010-04-26 18:28 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-26 18:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add batched discard support for ext4 - using rbtree Lukas Czerner
2010-04-26 18:42 ` Lukas Czerner
2010-04-27 15:29 ` Edward Shishkin
2010-04-21 20:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add batched discard support for ext4 Greg Freemyer
2010-04-19 16:20 ` Ext4: batched discard support Greg Freemyer
2010-04-19 16:30 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-19 17:58 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-04-19 18:04 ` Ric Wheeler [this message]
2010-04-20 20:24 ` Mark Lord
2010-04-20 20:34 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BCC9B43.8080805@redhat.com \
--to=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=eshishki@redhat.com \
--cc=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).