From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: Check for cases where EOFBLOCKS_FL is unnecessarily set Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:10:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4BE9FFEE.9030102@redhat.com> References: <1273609878-22746-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <4BE9D4F3.9080003@redhat.com> <20100512004452.GY18762@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ext4 Developers List To: tytso@mit.edu Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12617 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754205Ab0ELBKM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2010 21:10:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100512004452.GY18762@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: tytso@mit.edu wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 05:06:43PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Theodore Ts'o wrote: >>> Some kernels will crash if EOFBLOCKS_FL is set when it is it not >> Is there a kernel fix to go with this, then? > > There will be; Dmitry sent a patch in the ext4 patch a while back. > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50469/ > > The fix to prevent the crash is tiny. The rest of the patch I need to > review more carefully.... I'll get to it RSN. Ok sorry, I didn't put 2 & 2 together, there. :) Thanks for the reminder, -Eric > - Ted