From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Subject: Re: e4defrag and immutable files
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:28:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C057B68.9040205@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0574DF.3030303@redhat.com>
On 06/01/2010 02:00 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> tytso@mit.edu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:32:29PM -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>>
>>> We (ocfs2) are looking to add a new attribute to denote files that
>>> have a fixed allocation on disk. But at the same time, allow writes
>>> that do not change the allocation on disk. No truncating, extending,
>>> filling holes, etc. We were thinking of calling it "Static" files.
>>>
>> That's an interesting set of semantics, and it might make sense to
>> conflate that with a local disk "don't move or defrag" the file
>> option. I'm not crazy with the name "static", since it could mean a
>> number of other things in other contexts, but I admit I can't think of
>> a better name.
>>
>> - Ted
>>
> fixed-mapping files maybe?
>
We had thought of the term static because we wanted the inode to
be frozen. Entire metadata including the mapping. Our aim is to
do away with cluster locks for such inodes. For ios, we were planning
to limit it to only odirect and not change the mtime. That also means
no links, touch. Yes, "static" does not fit it like a glove but that's the
best we could come up with.
Sunil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-01 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 20:14 e4defrag and immutable files H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-28 21:21 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-05-28 22:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-01 19:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-06-01 19:32 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-06-01 19:49 ` tytso
2010-06-01 20:14 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-06-01 21:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-06-01 21:28 ` Sunil Mushran [this message]
2010-06-01 22:26 ` tytso
2010-06-01 22:51 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-06-02 7:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-02 18:02 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-06-08 22:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-09 1:10 ` Joel Becker
2010-06-09 1:44 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C057B68.9040205@oracle.com \
--to=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).