From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: "tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"adilger@sun.com" <adilger@sun.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fio test triggering bad data on ext4
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:39:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C34D7F5.2060309@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C348EB1.4010101@redhat.com>
On 07/07/10 16.26, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was writing a small fio job file to do writes and read verifies on a
>> device. It forks 32 processes, each writing randomly to 4 files with a
>> block size between 4k and 16k. When it has written 1024 of those blocks,
>> it'll verify the oldest 512 of them. Each block is checksummed for every
>> 512b. It uses libaio and O_DIRECT.
>>
>> It works on ext2 and btrfs. I haven't run it to completion yet, but they
>> survive 15-20 minutes just fine. ext4 doesn't even go a full minutes
>> before this triggers:
>>
>> Bad verify header 0 at 10137600
>> fio: pid=9943, err=84/file:io_u.c:1212, func=io_u_queued_complete, error=Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character
>>
>> writers: (groupid=0, jobs=32): err=84 (file:io_u.c:1212, func=io_u_queued_complete, error=Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character): pid=9943
>
> FYI:
>
> I asked Jens to test hch's and Jiaying's aio completion patches with this,
> and apparently those fixed this problem for him.
At least for a shorter run, but long enough that all the holes should
have been filled at this point. So it at least fixes my test case.
I can try and expand the run a bit if there's any interest in that,
and see if that still verifies correctly.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-07 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-18 8:07 fio test triggering bad data on ext4 Jens Axboe
2010-06-18 14:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-06-18 14:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-06-18 15:13 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-18 15:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-06-18 17:32 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-18 18:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-06-18 18:14 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-21 10:20 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-18 17:36 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-07 14:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-07 19:39 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-21 9:37 Frank Mehnert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C34D7F5.2060309@fusionio.com \
--to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox