From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, cmm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
pmac@au1.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] jbd2: Fix I/O hang in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:30:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C48B88E.2010703@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100721190252.GG1215@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On 07/21/2010 02:02 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
>>
>> I've been debugging a hang in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode
>> which is being seen on Power 6 systems quite a lot. When we get
>> in the hung state, all I/O to the disk in question gets blocked
>> where we stay indefinitely. Looking at the task list, I can see
>> we are stuck in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode waiting on a
>> wake up. I added some debug code to detect this scenario and
>> dump additional data if we were stuck in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode
>> for longer than 30 minutes. When it hit, I was able to see that
>> i_flags was 0, suggesting we missed the wake up.
>>
>> This patch changes i_flags to be an unsigned long, uses bit operators
>> to access it, and adds barriers around the accesses. Prior to applying
>> this patch, we were regularly hitting this hang on numerous systems
>> in our test environment. After applying the patch, the hangs no longer
>> occur. Its still not clear to me why the j_list_lock doesn't protect us
>> in this path.
> Thanks for debugging this! I was thinking hard about how it could happen that
> wake_up_bit doesn't wake up the waiter but I haven't found any explanation. All
> the waitqueue work seems to be properly wrapped inside the j_list_lock so
> even the waitqueue_active check in wake_up_bit should be fine.
> I'd really like to understand what in my mind-model of spinlocks etc. is
> wrong. So could you maybe run a test with the attached debug patch and
> dump 'wait.seen' value in the hung task?
> And one more question - if you remove 'waitqueue_active' check from
> kernel/wait.c:__wake_up_bit
> is the problem still present? Thanks a lot in advance.
I'll see about getting one of our systems loaded up with this change and see
what happens.
Thanks!
Brian
--
Brian King
Linux on Power Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-14 14:56 [PATCH 1/1] jbd2: Fix I/O hang in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode Brian King
2010-07-14 16:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-14 16:39 ` Brian King
2010-07-14 16:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-14 17:44 ` Josef Bacik
2010-07-14 18:58 ` [PATCHv2 " Brian King
2010-07-14 19:05 ` Josef Bacik
2010-07-14 20:08 ` Brian King
2010-07-21 14:01 ` Brian King
2010-07-21 19:02 ` Jan Kara
2010-07-21 19:06 ` Jan Kara
2010-07-22 21:30 ` Brian King [this message]
2010-08-27 19:10 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-27 19:28 ` Brian King
2010-08-31 14:04 ` Brian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C48B88E.2010703@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmac@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).