linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evan Jones <evanj@MIT.EDU>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Intel SSD data loss: Any possible way this is user / software error?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:02:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C64615B.70308@mit.edu> (raw)

I'm testing a few systems that attempt to log data to disk reliably. I 
bought a brand new Intel SSD (X25-M G2) for this purpose. It appears to 
me that this disk does *not* store data reliably when there are power 
failures, even with write barriers, even with the cache disabled. I'm 
surprised that this disk might be this broken (possible), but it may 
also mean I've made a mistake. Is there any possible way that I have a 
bug in the test described below? The test works as expected with a 
couple SATA magnetic disks.


Configuration:

* Linux 2.6.32 (a distributed with Ubuntu 10.04)
* SATA SSD directly attached to the system's built-in controller (Intel 
N10/ICH7)
* ext4 with default options (meaning barrier=1)
* Disable the write cache (hdparm -W 0 /dev/sdb)


The test:

1. Write a 64 MB file of zeros (first use fallocate, then zero fill)
2. fsync()
3. write() blocks of this file with a sequence number.
4. fdatasync()
5. Send UDP packet reporting the sequence number written.
6. Go to 3.

While this test is running, I pull the power out of the drive to 
simulate a hard failure. On the magnetic disks I have, this works as 
expected: On reboot, the log file contains the complete record that was 
reported as last written (it may also contain part of the next record).

On the X25-M, when I use large writes (128 kB), it loses data fairly 
frequently (every couple attempts): I either see the last log record as 
being before the reported one, or occasionally I get a media error when 
reading back the file.

I'm surprised that this disk could be this broken, but I suppose it is 
possible. Any help is welcomed. Thanks,

Evan Jones

-- 
Evan Jones
http://evanjones.ca/

             reply	other threads:[~2010-08-12 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-12 21:02 Evan Jones [this message]
2010-08-13 11:57 ` Intel SSD data loss: Any possible way this is user / software error? Eric Sandeen
2010-08-13 16:07   ` Evan Jones
2010-08-15 16:18     ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C64615B.70308@mit.edu \
    --to=evanj@mit.edu \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).