linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove alignment padding from ext4_inode_info on 64 bit builds
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:41:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7001C9.7050200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282393898.1978.18.camel@castor.rsk>

Richard Kennedy wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 15:11 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Richard Kennedy wrote:
>>> Reorder structure ext4_inode_info to remove 16 bytes of alignment
>>> padding on 64 bit builds. This shrinks its size from 904 to 888 bytes
>>> with (CONFIG_EXT4_S_XATTR=y && CONFIG_QUOTA=n).
>>>     
>>> This will allow this structure to use one fewer cache lines.
>>>
>>> Also change type of i_delalloc_reserved_flag to bool to better reflect
>>> its usage.
>>>
>>> compiled & tested on x86_64
>>
>> Looks good to me; there is still a bit of padding at the end:
>>
>>         qsize_t                    i_reserved_quota;     /*   864     8 */
>>         struct list_head           i_completed_io_list;  /*   872    16 */
>>         spinlock_t                 i_completed_io_lock;  /*   888     4 */
>>
>>         /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
>>
>>         /* --- cacheline 14 boundary (896 bytes) --- */
>>         ext4_io_end_t *            cur_aio_dio;          /*   896     8 */
>>         tid_t                      i_sync_tid;           /*   904     4 */
>>         tid_t                      i_datasync_tid;       /*   908     4 */
>>
>>
>> but it wouldn't save a cacheline anyway...
>>
>> -Eric
>>
> Thanks Eric, yes there is padding but we don't have anything to fill the
> hole with :(
> 
> If it becomes important to save space, i_state_flags seem to be unused
> in ext4 so we could possibly drop that.

Actually it is used, it's just expertly hidden in:

EXT4_INODE_BIT_FNS(state, state_flags):

#define EXT4_INODE_BIT_FNS(name, field)                                 \
static inline int ext4_test_inode_##name(struct inode *inode, int bit)  \
{                                                                       \
        return test_bit(bit, &EXT4_I(inode)->i_##field);                \
}                                                                       \

etc..

-Eric


      reply	other threads:[~2010-08-21 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-18 15:08 [PATCH] ext4: remove alignment padding from ext4_inode_info on 64 bit builds Richard Kennedy
2010-08-20 20:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-21 12:31   ` Richard Kennedy
2010-08-21 16:41     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C7001C9.7050200@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).