* extremely long delays are they possible?
@ 2010-10-16 6:02 Hubert Bahr
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hubert Bahr @ 2010-10-16 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
In reality I would prefer writes only occur to an ssd if the FS write
cache is overflowing. The application is package rebuilding. The
package is brought in from nfs expanded built (compiled etc) then the
results written back to an nfs mount and the log written to Cluster Head
then everything erased. However, if there are build problems the
expanded file system and results are left intact. My Memory Size is
large enough (16GB) to buffer the whole process except when a build
problem occur's. Since this can be hours into a build I would prefer to
capture. This is part of a cluster batch process that is only examined
at the expected end of the total batch process. Capturing the problems
precludes using only a ramfs, but I would like to avoid needless writes
to the ssd. I am afraid that embedded fsyncs may blow this anyway.
Maybe I could use some on error mv but I prefer the dynamic memory
sharing rather than a fixed ramfs. The longest single package build I
have observed is 11.5 hours and it also took the most space.
would fstab options like ext4
commit=50000,noatime,delalloc,data=writeback give me the desired action?
Thanks
Hubert
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-10-16 6:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-16 6:02 extremely long delays are they possible? Hubert Bahr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).