From: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
To: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Bernd Schubert <bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Subject: Re: ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:39:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC45318.3080002@ddn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC44EAF.3090507@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]
On 10/24/2010 05:20 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>
> This still sounds more like a Lustre issue than an ext4 one, Andreas can fill in
> the technical details.
The underlying device handling is unrelated to Lustre. In that sense it
is just a local filesystem.
>
> What ever shared storage sits under ext4 is irrelevant to the fail over case.
>
> Unless Lustre does other magic, they still need to obey the basic cluster rules
> - one mount per cluster.
Yes, one mount per cluster.
>
> If Lustre is doing the same trick you would do with active/passive failure over
> clusters that export ext4 via NFS, you would still need to clean up the file
> system before being able to re-export it from a fail over node.
What exactly is your question here? We use pacemaker/stonith to do the
fencing job.
What exactly do you want to clean up? The device is recovered by
journals, Lustre goes into recovery mode, clients reconnect, locks are
updated and incomplete transactions resend.
Cheers,
Bernd
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-24 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 13:33 ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure Bernd Schubert
2010-10-22 17:25 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-22 17:42 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-22 18:32 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-22 18:54 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 16:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2010-10-23 17:46 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 22:26 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-23 23:56 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 0:20 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 1:08 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-24 14:42 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 22:17 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-24 8:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2010-10-24 13:55 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 14:30 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 15:20 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 15:39 ` Bernd Schubert [this message]
2010-10-24 15:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 16:16 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 16:43 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 10:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-25 11:45 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 12:54 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 14:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-25 19:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 20:08 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-25 20:10 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 19:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-10-25 20:37 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC45318.3080002@ddn.com \
--to=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).