linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Sandon Van Ness <sandon@van-ness.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Piszcz <ap@solarrain.com>
Subject: Re: Is EXT4 the right FS for > 16TB?
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:01:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0E3A63.606@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012191151570.28865@p34.internal.lan>

On 12/19/10 10:53 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Wow, there were no updates though after Eric's last comment..
> Eric, have there been any improvements in the past 6 months?
> 
> Or should one still steer clear from EXT4 > 16TB?

There is still no released e2fsprogs which supports > 16T for
ext4, but testing of the not-released bits is welcomed...
Ted says a 16T-capable version is coming soon.  There's still
work to be done there, though.

-Eric

> Justin.
> 
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
> 
>> Was it me (houkouonchi) on hard forum? I asked if > 16 TiB support was
>> considered stable on here a while back:
>>
>> Is >16TB support considered stable?
>>
>> This was 6 months ago so maybe things have changed. The thread:
>>
>> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-ext4/2010/5/28/6884603/thread
>>
>> Luckily JFS fixed there userland utilities bug of not being able to
>> handle > 32TiB very shortly after this and I ended up going that route
>> and I have yet to have any data loss or problems on my JFS volume:
>>
>> root@dekabutsu: 08:32 AM :~# df -H /data
>> Filesystem             Size   Used  Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sdd1               36T    22T    15T  61% /data
>> root@dekabutsu: 08:32 AM :~#
>>
>> At work with our hundreds/thousands of servers we will likely be going
>> ext4 as we wont be using it on >16 TiB. I think its a huge improvement
>> over ext3 but for my use JFS ended up being a better fit. I
>> refuse/refused to go XFS.
>>
>> On 12/19/2010 03:52 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've read a lot of posts regarding people who setup RAID volumes of
>>> and up to around 16TB and EXT4 is typically used.
>>>
>>> However, in various forums, people still ask what is the correct
>>> filesystem for > 16TB?  I did read one post somewhere that stated the
>>> ext4 developers did not recommend using ext4 for very large volumes,
>>> is this still true?
>>>
>>> I am looking at creating a 43TB volume possibly in the near future and
>>> I have used XFS in the past, which works well and would probably not
>>> have any problem with it; however, I have bitten quite a number of
>>> times by XFS bugs in the past several years, so I was curious, how
>>> does EXT4 perform on larger volumes, e.g., 20TB?
>>>
>>> Are there any caveats / problems?
>>>
>>> Justin.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-19 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-19 11:52 Is EXT4 the right FS for > 16TB? Justin Piszcz
2010-12-19 16:35 ` Sandon Van Ness
2010-12-19 16:53   ` Justin Piszcz
2010-12-19 17:01     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-12-19 17:14       ` Ric Wheeler
2010-12-19 19:14       ` Justin Piszcz
2010-12-19 19:30         ` Eric Sandeen
2010-12-19 22:21           ` Ric Wheeler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D0E3A63.606@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=ap@solarrain.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandon@van-ness.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).