From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: orphan cleanup on readonly fs will corrupt future fs!
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:05:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6BB9BA.3050000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=_QBgDutcb7h2XHpjHR6k-4Rj-r6zryMXaNn6e@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/26/11 12:21 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have just realized something very disturbing -
> that orphan cleanup is not being skipped on readonly mount of ext4/ext3.
>
> I know that journal recovery is done on readonly mount
> and there is problem with that, since nothing happens
> in the fs level.
>
> But orphan cleanup deletes inodes and frees blocks and that
> could be very bad for some RO_COMPAT features, SNAPSHOT
> and BIGALLOC to name two.
One thing to note is that if the device itself is readonly,
both journal recovery and orphan processing will be skipped,
if I recall...
-Eric
> I am not so sure why orphan cleanup is so important for readonly
> mount in the first place?
>
> Now the damage has been done, because current stock kernels will
> corrupt future fs with SNAPSHOT and BIGALLOC features
> (unless Ted backs up from the decision to make BIGALLOC RO_COMPAT...)
>
> I think that we should skip orphan cleanup on readonly mount ASAP and try
> to push this fix to as many stable/maint kernels out there, before the
> problem gets worse.
>
> Can anyway see a problem with skipping orphan cleanup?
> Maybe there is a problem with later remount read-write?
>
> I would spend time more time to investigate these questions,
> but I find this problem too disturbing and urgent to wait until I find
> the time to do so...
>
> Amir.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-28 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-26 18:21 orphan cleanup on readonly fs will corrupt future fs! Amir Goldstein
2011-02-28 5:48 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 15:05 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6BB9BA.3050000@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).