From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: don't check/clone duplicate xattr blocks in fs without xattr feature
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:01:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D77EAAC.3010208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D52DFE7.4050301@redhat.com>
On 2/9/11 12:41 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I had an extremely corrupted customer filesystem which, after thousands
> of lines of e2fsck output, found one more problem on an immediately
> subsequent e2fsck. In short, a file had had its i_file_acl block
> cloned due to being a duplicate. That ultimately got cleared
> because the fs did not have the xattr feature, and the inode
> was subsequently removed due to invalid mode.
>
> The 2nd e2fsck pass found the cloned xattr block as in use, but
> not owned by any file, and had to fix up the block bitmaps.
>
> Simply skipping the processing of duplicate xattr blocks on a
> non-xattr filesystem seems reasonable, since they will be cleared
> later in any case.
>
> (also fix existing brace misalignment)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Ted, ping on this one? Would like to get it upstream before
pushing it to RHEL, because as we all know now, that's how
we roll at Red Hat. :)
Thanks,
-Eric
> ---
>
> diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1b.c b/e2fsck/pass1b.c
> index 155fcba..2ddaeb4 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/pass1b.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/pass1b.c
> @@ -310,12 +310,14 @@ static void pass1b(e2fsck_t ctx, char *block_buf)
> pctx.errcode = ext2fs_block_iterate3(fs, ino,
> BLOCK_FLAG_READ_ONLY, block_buf,
> process_pass1b_block, &pb);
> - if (ext2fs_file_acl_block(&inode)) {
> + /* If the feature is not set, attrs will be cleared later anyway */
> + if ((fs->super->s_feature_compat & EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR) &&
> + ext2fs_file_acl_block(&inode)) {
> blk64_t blk = ext2fs_file_acl_block(&inode);
> process_pass1b_block(fs, &blk,
> BLOCK_COUNT_EXTATTR, 0, 0, &pb);
> ext2fs_file_acl_block_set(&inode, blk);
> - }
> + }
> if (pb.dup_blocks) {
> end_problem_latch(ctx, PR_LATCH_DBLOCK);
> if (ino >= EXT2_FIRST_INODE(fs->super) ||
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-09 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-09 18:41 [PATCH] e2fsck: don't check/clone duplicate xattr blocks in fs without xattr feature Eric Sandeen
2011-03-09 21:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2011-05-23 17:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-23 18:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-23 18:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-01 0:00 ` Ted Ts'o
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-09 18:41 Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D77EAAC.3010208@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).