From: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request.
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:58:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9093ED.4070708@tao.ma> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103281437440.3158@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
On 03/28/2011 08:41 PM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Tao Ma wrote:
>>
>>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>>
>>> We have checked first_not_zeroed == ngroups already above,
>>> so remove this redundant check.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ext4/super.c | 5 -----
>>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
>>> index 2d1378f..37448a7 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
>>> @@ -2953,11 +2953,6 @@ static int ext4_register_li_request(struct super_block *sb,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (first_not_zeroed == ngroups) {
>>> - sbi->s_li_request = NULL;
>>> - return 0;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> elr = ext4_li_request_new(sb, first_not_zeroed);
>>> if (!elr)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>
>> Patch looks good.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Lukas
>
> Just one tiny thing, we do not even need to set
> sbi->s_li_request = NULL since it is NULL already and we check that
> in the beginning of the function.
yeah, another patch will be sent for this. thanks for the review. ;)
Regards,
Tao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-28 7:50 [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request Tao Ma
2011-03-28 12:33 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-28 12:41 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-28 13:58 ` Tao Ma [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9093ED.4070708@tao.ma \
--to=tm@tao.ma \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).