* [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request.
@ 2011-03-28 7:50 Tao Ma
2011-03-28 12:33 ` Lukas Czerner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tao Ma @ 2011-03-28 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
We have checked first_not_zeroed == ngroups already above,
so remove this redundant check.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 5 -----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 2d1378f..37448a7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -2953,11 +2953,6 @@ static int ext4_register_li_request(struct super_block *sb,
return 0;
}
- if (first_not_zeroed == ngroups) {
- sbi->s_li_request = NULL;
- return 0;
- }
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request.
2011-03-28 7:50 [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request Tao Ma
@ 2011-03-28 12:33 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-28 12:41 ` Lukas Czerner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lukas Czerner @ 2011-03-28 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tao Ma; +Cc: linux-ext4
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Tao Ma wrote:
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>
> We have checked first_not_zeroed == ngroups already above,
> so remove this redundant check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 5 -----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 2d1378f..37448a7 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -2953,11 +2953,6 @@ static int ext4_register_li_request(struct super_block *sb,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (first_not_zeroed == ngroups) {
> - sbi->s_li_request = NULL;
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> elr = ext4_li_request_new(sb, first_not_zeroed);
> if (!elr)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
Patch looks good.
Thanks!
-Lukas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request.
2011-03-28 12:33 ` Lukas Czerner
@ 2011-03-28 12:41 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-28 13:58 ` Tao Ma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lukas Czerner @ 2011-03-28 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lukas Czerner; +Cc: Tao Ma, linux-ext4
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Tao Ma wrote:
>
> > From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> >
> > We have checked first_not_zeroed == ngroups already above,
> > so remove this redundant check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/super.c | 5 -----
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 2d1378f..37448a7 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -2953,11 +2953,6 @@ static int ext4_register_li_request(struct super_block *sb,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > - if (first_not_zeroed == ngroups) {
> > - sbi->s_li_request = NULL;
> > - return 0;
> > - }
> > -
> > elr = ext4_li_request_new(sb, first_not_zeroed);
> > if (!elr)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
>
> Patch looks good.
>
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
Just one tiny thing, we do not even need to set
sbi->s_li_request = NULL since it is NULL already and we check that
in the beginning of the function.
Thanks!
-Lukas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request.
2011-03-28 12:41 ` Lukas Czerner
@ 2011-03-28 13:58 ` Tao Ma
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tao Ma @ 2011-03-28 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lukas Czerner; +Cc: linux-ext4
On 03/28/2011 08:41 PM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Tao Ma wrote:
>>
>>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>>
>>> We have checked first_not_zeroed == ngroups already above,
>>> so remove this redundant check.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ext4/super.c | 5 -----
>>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
>>> index 2d1378f..37448a7 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
>>> @@ -2953,11 +2953,6 @@ static int ext4_register_li_request(struct super_block *sb,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (first_not_zeroed == ngroups) {
>>> - sbi->s_li_request = NULL;
>>> - return 0;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> elr = ext4_li_request_new(sb, first_not_zeroed);
>>> if (!elr)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>
>> Patch looks good.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Lukas
>
> Just one tiny thing, we do not even need to set
> sbi->s_li_request = NULL since it is NULL already and we check that
> in the beginning of the function.
yeah, another patch will be sent for this. thanks for the review. ;)
Regards,
Tao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-28 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-28 7:50 [PATCH] ext4: Remove redundant check for first_not_zeroed in ext4_register_li_request Tao Ma
2011-03-28 12:33 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-28 12:41 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-28 13:58 ` Tao Ma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).