From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mjt@tls.msk.ru
Subject: Re: DIO process stuck apparently due to dioread_nolock (3.0)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:08:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E49447F.105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313251371-3672-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma>
On 8/13/11 11:02 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>
> Hi Michael,
> could you please check whether this patch work for you?
Thanks, this is the patch I meant to send, I guess ;) I think
I missed the "|=" case before :(
given that every place we set it requires a test and an increment
if not set, maybe a helper to do all that is in order?
-Eric
>
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Set unwritten flag and increase i_aiodio_unwritten simultaneously.
> From 4f1d797973da8b5cf79f58cc1e4d22efb9d46d19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:50:28 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Set unwritten flag and increase i_aiodio_unwritten simultaneously.
>
> EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten should
> be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear the flag and
> decrease the counter in the same time.
>
> We don't increase i_aiodio_unwritten when setting EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN so
> it will go nagative and causes some process to wait forever.
>
> Part of the patch came from Eric in his e-mail.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=131316851417460&w=2
>
> Reported-by: Michael Tokarev<mjt@tls.msk.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 ++++++++-
> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index d47264c..40c0b10 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2668,8 +2668,15 @@ static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - io_end->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + /*
> + * It may be over-defensive here to check EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN now,
> + * but being more careful is always safe for the future change.
> + */
> inode = io_end->inode;
> + if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> + io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> + }
>
> /* Add the io_end to per-inode completed io list*/
> spin_lock_irqsave(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index 430c401..78839af 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> @@ -334,8 +334,10 @@ submit_and_retry:
> if ((io_end->num_io_pages >= MAX_IO_PAGES) &&
> (io_end->pages[io_end->num_io_pages-1] != io_page))
> goto submit_and_retry;
> - if (buffer_uninit(bh))
> - io->io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + if (buffer_uninit(bh) && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> + io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> + }
> io->io_end->size += bh->b_size;
> io->io_next_block++;
> ret = bio_add_page(io->io_bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-10 10:51 DIO process stuck apparently due to dioread_nolock (3.0) Michael Tokarev
2011-08-11 11:59 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-11 12:21 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-11 14:01 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-11 20:05 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-12 2:46 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-12 6:23 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-12 7:07 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-12 13:07 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-12 15:55 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-12 17:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-08-12 17:34 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-13 16:02 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-14 20:57 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-14 21:07 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-15 2:36 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-15 8:00 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-15 8:56 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-15 9:03 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-15 10:28 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-15 23:53 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-16 4:15 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-16 8:38 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-16 13:53 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-16 15:03 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-16 21:32 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-16 22:28 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-16 23:07 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-17 17:02 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-08-18 6:49 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-18 18:54 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-19 3:20 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-19 3:18 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-19 7:05 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-08-19 17:55 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-16 23:59 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-17 0:08 ` Jiaying Zhang
2011-08-17 2:22 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-17 9:04 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-15 16:08 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2011-08-16 4:12 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-16 6:15 ` Tao Ma
2011-08-12 21:19 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E49447F.105@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=tm@tao.ma \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).