From: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Subject: Re: lock i_mutex for fallocate?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:12:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5EDBE4.8010604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5ED2D5.8040302@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Oh, I meant for this to go to linux-fsdevel instead of linux-kernel, but
all feedback is welcome! :)
On 08/31/2011 05:33 PM, Allison Henderson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In ext4 punch hole, we realized that the punch hole operation needs to
> be done under i_mutex just like truncate. i_mutex for truncate is held
> in the vfs layer, so we dont need to lock it at the file system layer,
> but vfs does not lock i_mutex for fallocate. We can lock i_mutex for
> fallocate at the fs layer, but question was raised then: should i_mutex
> for fallocate be held in the vfs layer instead? I do not know if other
> file systems need i_mutex to be locked for fallocate, or if they might
> be locking it already, so I am doing some investigating on this idea,
> and also the appropriate use of i_mutex in general. Can someone provide
> some insight this topic? Thx!
>
> Allison Henderson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-01 0:33 lock i_mutex for fallocate? Allison Henderson
2011-09-01 1:10 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-09-01 1:12 ` Allison Henderson [this message]
2011-09-01 17:59 ` Josef Bacik
2011-09-01 7:08 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-01 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 17:47 ` Allison Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5EDBE4.8010604@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).