From: Matt Parnell <mparnell@gmail.com>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug In ext4 in kernels > 2.6.39 - Not mounting with arguments/options I specify in fstab on root remount
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:18:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB73FFB.9050506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111022093218.GF4196@thunk.org>
On 10/22/2011 02:32 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:51:35AM -0500, Matt Parnell wrote:
>> That doesn't really help me at all, it's not
>> rootflags=data=writeback causing this, it's starting to make me
>> think that arch's init may be to blame, although I previously ruled
>> it out...
> Well, it looks like rootflags=data=writeback is not making it to the
> file system. That's why it's not showing up in /proc/mounts, from you
> showed us. Can you look at the kernel dmesg?
>
> You should see something like this:
>
> [ 1.421146] EXT3-fs (vda): error: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (240)
> [ 1.434057] EXT4-fs (vda): couldn't mount as ext2 due to feature incompatibilities
> [ 1.454631] EXT4-fs (vda): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode. Opts: data=writeback
> [ 1.455966] VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on device 254:0.
>
>
> The first line is the failure to mount the root file system as ext3.
> The 2nd is the failure to mount the file system as ext2, using the
> ext4 file system driver. The last two lines show the options show the
> mount as ext4.
>
> What do those two lines look to you. If you don't see "Opts:
> data=writeback", then somehow the rootflags option isn't getting passed
> down to the file system. Then when you try to remount the file system
> read/write, the fact that you have "data=writeback" in your /etc/fstab
> causes the failure to remount.
>
> If you simply remove that from /etc/fstab, things should work better.
> The remount will preserve whatever data=journalling mode was in use
> when the root file system was originallymounted as. If rootflags is
> non-functional, then the file system won't be mounted as
> data=writeback, but at least the boot sequence will continue without
> blowing out.
>
> - Ted
Since then, I created a fresh partition and re rsynced my root over onto
it after making it WITHOUT a journal using the current sysrescue64 cd
(kernel 3.0.1).
Same thing is happening, and the drive still refuses to mount any other
way except
/dev/root / ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1 0 0
Despite my specifying these in fstab and grub.cfg ...it's like it's not
even passing the options somewhere, either from grub2 to the kernel or
from my initscripts...but since I've tried using openrc too and get this
result, I'm not sure what to do. Note that using both /dev/sdb1 and
/dev/root don't interchange between the fstab and the kernel...I think
the /dev/root symlink may be breaking my initscripts.
/dev/sdb1 / ext4
noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,nouser_xattr,barrier=0,commit=10 0 0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-07 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4E6F1B49.3010803@gmail.com>
2011-09-13 9:01 ` Bug In ext4 in kernels > 2.6.39 - Not mounting with arguments/options I specify in fstab on root remount Matt Parnell
2011-09-13 10:25 ` Christian Kujau
[not found] ` <CABeR261eWW1vi1Xk9E6SWdy7PN=oiDbQdT_LiHgZf7+6V7Sv8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-13 10:48 ` Christian Kujau
2011-09-13 14:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-10-09 22:10 ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-09 23:44 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-21 3:29 ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-21 4:29 ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22 5:00 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-22 7:51 ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22 7:53 ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22 9:32 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-11-07 2:18 ` Matt Parnell [this message]
2011-11-07 2:24 ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07 5:26 ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07 5:32 ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07 15:47 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-11-08 1:48 ` Matt Parnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB73FFB.9050506@gmail.com \
--to=mparnell@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).