linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Parnell <mparnell@gmail.com>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug In ext4 in kernels > 2.6.39 - Not mounting with arguments/options I specify in fstab on root remount
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:26:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB76C21.5060104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB7416A.7080006@gmail.com>

On 11/06/2011 06:24 PM, Matt Parnell wrote:
> On 10/22/2011 02:32 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:51:35AM -0500, Matt Parnell wrote:
>>> That doesn't really help me at all, it's not
>>> rootflags=data=writeback causing this, it's starting to make me
>>> think that arch's init may be to blame, although I previously ruled
>>> it out...
>> Well, it looks like rootflags=data=writeback is not making it to the
>> file system.  That's why it's not showing up in /proc/mounts, from you
>> showed us.  Can you look at the kernel dmesg?
>>
>> You should see something like this:
>>
>> [    1.421146] EXT3-fs (vda): error: couldn't mount because of 
>> unsupported optional features (240)
>> [    1.434057] EXT4-fs (vda): couldn't mount as ext2 due to feature 
>> incompatibilities
>> [    1.454631] EXT4-fs (vda): mounted filesystem with writeback data 
>> mode. Opts: data=writeback
>> [    1.455966] VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on device 
>> 254:0.
>>
>>
>> The first line is the failure to mount the root file system as ext3.
>> The 2nd is the failure to mount the file system as ext2, using the
>> ext4 file system driver.  The last two lines show the options show the
>> mount as ext4.
>>
>> What do those two lines look to you.  If you don't see "Opts:
>> data=writeback", then somehow the rootflags option isn't getting passed
>> down to the file system.  Then when you try to remount the file system
>> read/write, the fact that you have "data=writeback" in your /etc/fstab
>> causes the failure to remount.
>>
>> If you simply remove that from /etc/fstab, things should work better.
>> The remount will preserve whatever data=journalling mode was in use
>> when the root file system was originallymounted as.  If rootflags is
>> non-functional, then the file system won't be mounted as
>> data=writeback, but at least the boot sequence will continue without
>> blowing out.
>>
>>                             - Ted
> Looks like the kernel isn't creating the /dev/root link/block device, 
> either all of the time or some of the time, I'm confused.
I figured it out. data=writeback isn't needed and is done by default if 
there's no journal, as per commit 
373cd5c53d5ea6622c319ecd84e29e2737d488bd 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=373cd5c53d5ea6622c319ecd84e29e2737d488bd

...sorry about throwing you guys through loops over this, although I'm 
guessing there's still a bug in that the kernel should just warn the 
user about the option when it's used and otherwise ignore it instead of 
breaking if there's no journal.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-07  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4E6F1B49.3010803@gmail.com>
2011-09-13  9:01 ` Bug In ext4 in kernels > 2.6.39 - Not mounting with arguments/options I specify in fstab on root remount Matt Parnell
2011-09-13 10:25   ` Christian Kujau
     [not found]     ` <CABeR261eWW1vi1Xk9E6SWdy7PN=oiDbQdT_LiHgZf7+6V7Sv8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-13 10:48       ` Christian Kujau
2011-09-13 14:49   ` Eric Sandeen
2011-10-09 22:10     ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-09 23:44       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-21  3:29         ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-21  4:29           ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22  5:00           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-22  7:51             ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22  7:53               ` Matt Parnell
2011-10-22  9:32               ` Ted Ts'o
2011-11-07  2:18                 ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07  2:24                 ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07  5:26                   ` Matt Parnell [this message]
2011-11-07  5:32                     ` Matt Parnell
2011-11-07 15:47                     ` Ted Ts'o
2011-11-08  1:48                       ` Matt Parnell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB76C21.5060104@gmail.com \
    --to=mparnell@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).