Re: [PATCH] ext3: Fix error handling on inode bitmap corruption

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>]

On 12/8/11 4:28 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 08-12-11 14:46:09, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 12/8/11 2:28 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> When insert_inode_locked() fails in ext3_new_inode() it most likely
>>> means inode bitmap got corrupted and we allocated again inode which
>>> is already in use. Also doing unlock_new_inode() during error recovery
>>> is wrong since inode does not have I_NEW set. Fix the problem by jumping
>>> to fail: (instead of fail_drop:) which declares filesystem error and
>>> does not call unlock_new_inode().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>>
>> I think ext2 could use the same treatment.
>>
>> BTW, though, have you recently started seeing the issue?  We have
>> people hitting this when resuming after suspend; it seems likely
>> that the bitmap did get corrupted though, based on some other
>> things seen in similar bugs.
>   Interesting. I've got a report from IBM testing ext3 on SLE11 SP2 kernel
> (3.0 based). Their filesystem got damaged (might be HW issue, not sure yet)
> and they also observed warnings from unlock_new_inode().

It may be that it has been failing in other ways, but now we get the WARN_ON
and the long backtrace so it's reported more frequently...

I think there might be a hibernate issue that is causing the underlying
corruption, trying to look into that now.

-Eric

> 								Honza
>>> ---
>>>  fs/ext3/ialloc.c |    8 ++++++--
>>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ext3/ialloc.c b/fs/ext3/ialloc.c
>>> index 5c866e0..adae962 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ext3/ialloc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ext3/ialloc.c
>>> @@ -525,8 +525,12 @@ got:
>>>  	if (IS_DIRSYNC(inode))
>>>  		handle->h_sync = 1;
>>>  	if (insert_inode_locked(inode) < 0) {
>>> -		err = -EINVAL;
>>> -		goto fail_drop;
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * Likely a bitmap corruption causing inode to be allocated
>>> +		 * twice.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		err = -EIO;
>>> +		goto fail;
>>>  	}
>>>  	spin_lock(&sbi->s_next_gen_lock);
>>>  	inode->i_generation = sbi->s_next_generation++;
>>