From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@google.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: what happened with dccaf33fa37 "ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO" for 3.0?
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:21:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F676B2F.8040209@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgt=MCXRzLx+s1mthr1oD=Pj=HQ5kxnOdbtX8Q9=wSeZ41u2w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]
19.03.2012 21:10, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jan Kara<jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On Sat 17-03-12 13:31:30, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> Maybe just a one-line reply isn't THAT difficult?
> Sorry for the slow response. I am not sure what happened to this patch.
> Ted, do you know what we need to do to get this patch to the
> stable release?
For reference, attached is the version I use locally since last August.
...
>>>>> There was one more ext4 commit at that time, which made its way into
>>>>> stable but this one did not.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if the reason for that was the fact that it needed a small
>>>>> "backport" for 3.0, since in 3.1+ the code has been moved into another
>>>>> file, and the context is slightly different. In that case, attached
>>>>> is the "backport" which we use with 3.0.x since that time.
Thanks,
/mjt
[-- Attachment #2: ext4-flush-any-pending-end_io-requests-before-DIO-reads-w-dioread_nolock-dccaf33fa3.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2055 bytes --]
(backported to 3.0 by mjt)
upstream_commit dccaf33fa37a1bc5d651baeb3bfeb6becb86597b
Author: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Date: Fri Aug 19 19:13:32 2011 -0400
ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO reads w/dioread_nolock
There is a race between ext4 buffer write and direct_IO read with
dioread_nolock mount option enabled. The problem is that we clear
PageWriteback flag during end_io time but will do
uninitialized-to-initialized extent conversion later with dioread_nolock.
If an O_direct read request comes in during this period, ext4 will return
zero instead of the recently written data.
This patch checks whether there are any pending uninitialized-to-initialized
extent conversion requests before doing O_direct read to close the race.
Note that this is just a bandaid fix. The fundamental issue is that we
clear PageWriteback flag before we really complete an IO, which is
problem-prone. To fix the fundamental issue, we may need to implement an
extent tree cache that we can use to look up pending to-be-converted extents.
Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
index b8602cd..0962642 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3507,12 +3507,17 @@ ssize_t ext4_ind_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
}
retry:
- if (rw == READ && ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))
+ if (rw == READ && ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&ei->i_completed_io_list))) {
+ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ }
ret = __blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
offset, nr_segs,
ext4_get_block, NULL, NULL, 0);
- else {
+ } else {
ret = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
offset, nr_segs,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 20:38 what happened with dccaf33fa37 "ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO" for 3.0? Michael Tokarev
2012-02-28 11:42 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-03-17 9:31 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-03-19 16:42 ` Jan Kara
2012-03-19 17:10 ` Jiaying Zhang
2012-03-19 17:21 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2012-03-28 22:22 ` Greg KH
2012-03-19 17:21 ` Greg KH
2012-03-19 17:30 ` Jiaying Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F676B2F.8040209@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox