From: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ext4: Remove restrictive checks for EOFBLOCKS_FL
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:10:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6A6E12.7050505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332314639-22875-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>
On 03/21/2012 12:23 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> We are going to remove the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag in the future, so this is
> the first part of the removal. We can not remove it entirely just now,
> since the e2fsck is still checking for it and it might cause headache to
> some people. Instead, remove the restrictive checks now and the rest
> later, when the new e2fsck code is out and common enough.
>
> This is also needed because punch hole already breaks the EOFBLOCKS_FL
> semantics, so it might cause the some troubles. So simply remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner<lczerner@redhat.com>
Alrighty, I went over your set and it all looks good to me. Thx Lukas!
Allison Henderson
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 ++----
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 9e10b82..06b0792 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -3291,11 +3291,13 @@ static int check_eofblocks_fl(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> depth = ext_depth(inode);
> eh = path[depth].p_hdr;
>
> - if (unlikely(!eh->eh_entries)) {
> - EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "eh->eh_entries == 0 and "
> - "EOFBLOCKS_FL set");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> + /*
> + * We're going to remove EOFBLOCKS_FL entirely in future so we
> + * do not care for this case anymore. Simply remove the flag
> + * if there are no extents.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!eh->eh_entries))
> + goto out;
> last_ex = EXT_LAST_EXTENT(eh);
> /*
> * We should clear the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag if we are writing the
> @@ -3319,6 +3321,7 @@ static int check_eofblocks_fl(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> for (i = depth-1; i>= 0; i--)
> if (path[i].p_idx != EXT_LAST_INDEX(path[i].p_hdr))
> return 0;
> +out:
> ext4_clear_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EOFBLOCKS);
> return ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index feaa82f..55f5b91 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -4152,11 +4152,9 @@ int ext4_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> }
>
> if (attr->ia_valid& ATTR_SIZE) {
> - if (attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode)) {
> + if (attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode))
> truncate_setsize(inode, attr->ia_size);
> - ext4_truncate(inode);
> - } else if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EOFBLOCKS))
> - ext4_truncate(inode);
> + ext4_truncate(inode);
> }
>
> if (!rc) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-21 7:23 [PATCH 1/5] ext4: Remove restrictive checks for EOFBLOCKS_FL Lukas Czerner
2012-03-21 7:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: Correctly handle EOFBLOCKS flag in ext4_ext_punch_hole Lukas Czerner
2012-03-22 2:13 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-22 8:25 ` Lukas Czerner
2012-03-22 13:47 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-22 14:05 ` Lukas Czerner
2012-03-21 7:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: Allow punch hole beyond i_size Lukas Czerner
2012-03-21 7:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: Remove uneeded i_size handling Lukas Czerner
2012-03-21 7:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: Correct ext4_punch_hole return codes Lukas Czerner
2012-03-22 0:10 ` Allison Henderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F6A6E12.7050505@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).