From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: call vfs llseek code from ext4_dir_llseek
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:34:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F99CD89.7070407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F99904F.3040000@redhat.com>
ext4_dir_llseek can call the vfs llseek functions and get all the
the functionality needed by the NFS server.
For htree directories, we call the _sized() variant with the
maximum allowable hash value. For non-htree, we can call
ext4_file_llseek, which will sort out the maximum allowable
offset based on whether the dir is extent based or not.
This does lose the special SEEK_END handling of going to the
max hash size, but I know of no usecase for that and no bugs,
despite SEEK_END going to i_size and not the hash EOF for
many years now, so I don't think the cut & paste is warranted.
The vfs function can be expanded if it's critical.
This also returns dir llseek to it's (mostly) lockless
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/ext4/dir.c b/fs/ext4/dir.c
index b867862..faebc89 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/dir.c
@@ -312,74 +312,26 @@ static inline loff_t ext4_get_htree_eof(struct file *filp)
/*
- * ext4_dir_llseek() based on generic_file_llseek() to handle both
- * non-htree and htree directories, where the "offset" is in terms
- * of the filename hash value instead of the byte offset.
+ * ext4_dir_llseek() calls generic_file_llseek_size to handle htree
+ * directories, where the "offset" is in terms of the filename hash
+ * value instead of the byte offset.
*
- * NOTE: offsets obtained *before* ext4_set_inode_flag(dir, EXT4_INODE_INDEX)
- * will be invalid once the directory was converted into a dx directory
+ * Because we may return a 64-bit hash that is well beyond offset limits,
+ * we need to pass the max hash as the maximum allowable offset in
+ * the htree directory case.
+ *
+ * For non-htree, ext4_llseek already chooses the proper max offset.
*/
loff_t ext4_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
{
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
- loff_t ret = -EINVAL;
int dx_dir = is_dx_dir(inode);
- mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
-
- /* NOTE: relative offsets with dx directories might not work
- * as expected, as it is difficult to figure out the
- * correct offset between dx hashes */
-
- switch (origin) {
- case SEEK_END:
- if (unlikely(offset > 0))
- goto out_err; /* not supported for directories */
-
- /* so only negative offsets are left, does that have a
- * meaning for directories at all? */
- if (dx_dir)
- offset += ext4_get_htree_eof(file);
- else
- offset += inode->i_size;
- break;
- case SEEK_CUR:
- /*
- * Here we special-case the lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR)
- * position-querying operation. Avoid rewriting the "same"
- * f_pos value back to the file because a concurrent read(),
- * write() or lseek() might have altered it
- */
- if (offset == 0) {
- offset = file->f_pos;
- goto out_ok;
- }
-
- offset += file->f_pos;
- break;
- }
-
- if (unlikely(offset < 0))
- goto out_err;
-
- if (!dx_dir) {
- if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)
- goto out_err;
- } else if (offset > ext4_get_htree_eof(file))
- goto out_err;
-
- /* Special lock needed here? */
- if (offset != file->f_pos) {
- file->f_pos = offset;
- file->f_version = 0;
- }
-
-out_ok:
- ret = offset;
-out_err:
- mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-26 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 19:23 [PATCH, RFC] ext4: remove ext4_dir_llseek Eric Sandeen
2012-04-26 18:13 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-26 22:34 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F99CD89.7070407@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).