From: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Protect group inode free counting with group lock.
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:17:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB45FBE.10004@tao.ma> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB3CC8C.4030502@redhat.com>
On 05/16/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/16/12 9:55 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
>> On 05/16/2012 09:43 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 5/16/12 3:49 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
>>>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>>>
>>>> Now when we set the group inode free count, we don't have a proper
>>>> group lock so that multiple threads may decrease the inode free
>>>> count at the same time. And e2fsck will complain something like:
>>>
>>> This is only in the ! EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM case I guess?
>>> That would be worth mentioning in the summary & changelog.
>> sure, I will add it in v2.
>>>
>>> I guess you were testing without that for some reason?
>> See my comments below. I found it when running xfstests 269.
>
> Still not sure how you got a filesystem w/o that feature though, unless
> I am forgetting something obvious. Isn't it on by default?
oh, I see. Yes, we mkfs the system with the following configurations:
mke2fs -O ^resize_inode,^uninit_bg,extent,meta_bg,flex_bg,ext_attr
Maybe that's the reason why it has never be met by others before. ;)
Thanks
Tao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 8:49 [PATCH] ext4: Protect group inode free counting with group lock Tao Ma
2012-05-16 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-16 14:55 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-16 15:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-17 2:17 ` Tao Ma [this message]
2012-05-17 3:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-28 22:22 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29 2:18 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-29 5:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-29 12:39 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29 14:28 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-16 14:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-16 15:10 ` Tao Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB45FBE.10004@tao.ma \
--to=tm@tao.ma \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).