linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Protect group inode free counting with group lock.
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:14:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB46D2D.1050107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB45FBE.10004@tao.ma>

On 5/16/12 9:17 PM, Tao Ma wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 5/16/12 9:55 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
>>> On 05/16/2012 09:43 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> On 5/16/12 3:49 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
>>>>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now when we set the group inode free count, we don't have a proper
>>>>> group lock so that multiple threads may decrease the inode free
>>>>> count at the same time. And e2fsck will complain something like:
>>>>
>>>> This is only in the ! EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM case I guess?
>>>> That would be worth mentioning in the summary & changelog.
>>> sure, I will add it in v2.
>>>>
>>>> I guess you were testing without that for some reason?
>>> See my comments below. I found it when running xfstests 269.
>>
>> Still not sure how you got a filesystem w/o that feature though, unless
>> I am forgetting something obvious.  Isn't it on by default?
> oh, I see. Yes, we mkfs the system with the following configurations:
> mke2fs -O ^resize_inode,^uninit_bg,extent,meta_bg,flex_bg,ext_attr
> Maybe that's the reason why it has never be met by others before. ;)

Ok, good.  I figured it was in some barely-reachable corner
of the infinite test matrix ;)

-Eric

> Thanks
> Tao
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-17  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-16  8:49 [PATCH] ext4: Protect group inode free counting with group lock Tao Ma
2012-05-16 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-16 14:55   ` Tao Ma
2012-05-16 15:49     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-17  2:17       ` Tao Ma
2012-05-17  3:14         ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-05-28 22:22         ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29  2:18           ` Tao Ma
2012-05-29  5:57             ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-29 12:39               ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29 14:28                 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-16 14:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-16 15:10   ` Tao Ma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB46D2D.1050107@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tm@tao.ma \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).