From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Brad Figg <brad.figg@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Ext4 regression testing
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:01:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5051142D.1050603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50511241.2090603@canonical.com>
Hi Brad -
(cc: xfs list too)
On 9/12/12 5:52 PM, Brad Figg wrote:
>
> The Ubuntu kernel team has been putting some automated testing
> infrastructure in place. We are very interested in engaging with
> the appropriate upstream developers. We have been running the
> xfstests that come as part of the autotest testing framework.
> Some of these tests fail or never complete when run against an
> Ext4 file-system.
Which ones? Feel free to file bugs or send mail. Tests should pass.
Sometimes it's a test bug, though, of course ;)
> Our initial questions are:
>
> 1. Is this an appropriate set of tests to be run as regression
> tests?
Yes, that's what it's for!
> 2. Is there a list of the xfstests that are appropriate for
> Ext4?
Any test which says
_supported_fs generic
or
_supported_fs ext4
can run on ext4, and should in theory pass. I think there are
about 100 of them by now.
There is a "dangerous" group (see groups file) which contains test nrs that
might stop testing via a hang or panic. But don't skip those by
default; newer kernels with those bugs fixed _should_ pass them too.
> 3. Are there additional regression tests that would be beneficial
> to the Linux community for us to be running?
We've been encouraging new tests to be written for xfstests lately,
and it's gotten a good amount of traction. There certainly may be
other things out there, though.
-Eric
> Test results can be found at:
> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/index.html
>
>
> Thanks
> Brad
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 22:52 Ubuntu Ext4 regression testing Brad Figg
2012-09-12 23:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-09-12 23:15 ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13 0:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-13 0:41 ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13 1:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-13 2:04 ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13 2:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-13 2:17 ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13 2:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-13 2:18 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-13 2:50 ` Brad Figg
2012-09-19 3:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5051142D.1050603@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=brad.figg@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).