linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Brad Figg <brad.figg@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Ext4 regression testing
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:01:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5051142D.1050603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50511241.2090603@canonical.com>

Hi Brad -

(cc: xfs list too)

On 9/12/12 5:52 PM, Brad Figg wrote:
> 
> The Ubuntu kernel team has been putting some automated testing
> infrastructure in place. We are very interested in engaging with
> the appropriate upstream developers. We have been running the
> xfstests that come as part of the autotest testing framework.
> Some of these tests fail or never complete when run against an
> Ext4 file-system. 

Which ones?  Feel free to file bugs or send mail.  Tests should pass.
Sometimes it's a test bug, though, of course ;)

> Our initial questions are:
> 
> 1. Is this an appropriate set of tests to be run as regression
>    tests?

Yes, that's what it's for!

> 2. Is there a list of the xfstests that are appropriate for
>    Ext4?

Any test which says

_supported_fs generic
or
_supported_fs ext4

can run on ext4, and should in theory pass.  I think there are
about 100 of them by now.

There is a "dangerous" group (see groups file) which contains test nrs that
might stop testing via a hang or panic.  But don't skip those by
default; newer kernels with those bugs fixed _should_ pass them too.

> 3. Are there additional regression tests that would be beneficial
>    to the Linux community for us to be running?

We've been encouraging new tests to be written for xfstests lately,
and it's gotten a good amount of traction.  There certainly may be
other things out there, though.

-Eric


> Test results can be found at:
>     http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/index.html
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Brad
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-12 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-12 22:52 Ubuntu Ext4 regression testing Brad Figg
2012-09-12 23:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-09-12 23:15   ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13  0:20     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-13  0:41       ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13  1:51         ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-13  2:04           ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13  2:09             ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-13  2:17               ` Brad Figg
2012-09-13  2:24               ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-13  2:18 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-13  2:50   ` Brad Figg
2012-09-19  3:41     ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5051142D.1050603@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=brad.figg@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).