linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2] ext4: fix possible non-initialized variable
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:30:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50574226.3020908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505739F8.9050305@redhat.com>

On 9/17/12 9:55 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 9/15/12 1:30 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:55:48AM -0000, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
>>> htree_dirblock_to_tree() declares a non-initialized 'err' variable,
>>> which is passed as a reference to another functions expecting them
>>> to set this variable with thei error codes.  It's passed to
>>> ext4_bread(), which then passes it to ext4_getblk(). If
>>> ext4_map_blocks() returns 0 due to a lookup failure, leaving the
>>> ext4_getblk() buffer_head uninitialized, it will make ext4_getblk()
>>> return to ext4_bread() without initialize the 'err' variable, and
>>> ext4_bread() will return to htree_dirblock_to_tree() with this
>>> variable still uninitialized.
>>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Thanks for noticing this problem!
>>
>> In the case where there is no block mapping for a particular block,
>> ext4_bread() can return NULL, and with your patch, *err will now be
>> zero instead of some uninitialized value.  That's an improvement, and
>> in the case of htree_dirblock_to_tree(), when we return 0 as an
>> "error", the caller will do the right thing.
> 
> Hm, sorry, I had counseled Carlos to do that.  I figured a bmap
> call w/o create set, returning a NULL bh was perfectly valid - it simply
> means that it's not mapped there, right? - so a 0 retval made sense
> to me.

fwiw, the uninit variable came about as part of
2ed886852adfcb070bf350e66a0da0d98b2f3ab5; before that we happily returned
0 for an unmapped block; see below.  So unless something else has changed
since then, Carlos' patch shouldn't be doing any harm, at least.  An
audit may be in order but anyone misunderstanding a NULL/0 return has probably
been that way for a while.

 struct buffer_head *ext4_getblk(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
                                ext4_lblk_t block, int create, int *errp)
 {
        struct buffer_head dummy;
        int fatal = 0, err;
        int flags = 0;
 
        J_ASSERT(handle != NULL || create == 0);
 
        dummy.b_state = 0;
        dummy.b_blocknr = -1000;
        buffer_trace_init(&dummy.b_history);
        if (create)
                flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE;
        err = ext4_get_blocks(handle, inode, block, 1, &dummy, flags);
        /*
         * ext4_get_blocks() returns number of blocks mapped. 0 in
         * case of a HOLE.
         */
        if (err > 0) {
                if (err > 1)
                        WARN_ON(1);
                err = 0;
        }
        *errp = err;




  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-17 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-10 21:55 [PATCH v2] ext4: fix possible non-initialized variable Carlos Maiolino
2012-09-15 18:30 ` [v2] " Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-17 14:55   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-17 15:30     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-09-17 15:37       ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-17 18:26         ` Carlos Maiolino
2012-09-18  3:59           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 12:51             ` Carlos Maiolino
2012-09-19 20:10               ` Carlos Maiolino
2012-09-19 20:41                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-20  2:59                   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-21 19:14                     ` Carlos Maiolino
2012-09-22  0:52                       ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50574226.3020908@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).