* Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
@ 2012-09-18 2:04 Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 2:29 ` Jie Liu
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-09-18 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4
Does anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA handy? As near as I
can tell xfstests doesn't have any tests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA
functionality, and I was hoping someone had some test programs and test
sets already written.
Thanks!!
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 2:04 Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-09-18 2:29 ` Jie Liu 2012-09-18 6:21 ` Marco Stornelli 2012-09-18 6:40 ` Dave Chinner 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jie Liu @ 2012-09-18 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4 Hi Ted, On 09/18/12 10:04, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Does anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA handy? As near as I > can tell xfstests doesn't have any tests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA > functionality, and I was hoping someone had some test programs and test > sets already written. I have submitted two test cases to xfstests for this tests. xfstests: introduce 285 for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE sanity test xfstests: introduce 286 for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE copy test Thanks, -Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 2:04 Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 2:29 ` Jie Liu @ 2012-09-18 6:21 ` Marco Stornelli 2012-09-18 6:40 ` Dave Chinner 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marco Stornelli @ 2012-09-18 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4 2012/9/18 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>: > > Does anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA handy? As near as I > can tell xfstests doesn't have any tests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA > functionality, and I was hoping someone had some test programs and test > sets already written. > > Thanks!! > > - Ted Hi, under the folder "test" here (http://pramfs.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb-index.cgi) you can find the test lseek.c Regards, Marco ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 2:04 Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 2:29 ` Jie Liu 2012-09-18 6:21 ` Marco Stornelli @ 2012-09-18 6:40 ` Dave Chinner 2012-09-18 14:43 ` Mark Tinguely 2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dave Chinner @ 2012-09-18 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4, xfs On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:04:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Does anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA handy? As near as I > can tell xfstests doesn't have any tests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA > functionality, and I was hoping someone had some test programs and test > sets already written. Perhaps a cc to xfs@oss.sgi.com so the xfstests maintainers see the question would be a sensible idea? As it is, there are tests pending check-in that test seek-data/seek-hole functionality - they were used to verify the unwritten extent aware XFS implementation that recently went into the kernel.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 6:40 ` Dave Chinner @ 2012-09-18 14:43 ` Mark Tinguely 2012-09-18 18:15 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Mark Tinguely @ 2012-09-18 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Theodore Ts'o, linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4, xfs On 09/18/12 01:40, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:04:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >> >> Does anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA handy? As near as I >> can tell xfstests doesn't have any tests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA >> functionality, and I was hoping someone had some test programs and test >> sets already written. > > Perhaps a cc to xfs@oss.sgi.com so the xfstests maintainers see the > question would be a sensible idea? > > As it is, there are tests pending check-in that test > seek-data/seek-hole functionality - they were used to verify the > unwritten extent aware XFS implementation that recently went into > the kernel.... > > Cheers, > > Dave. xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). There is rough version of another test that I got directly from Jeff Lui, the person who wrote the SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA feature in XFS. This version tests the advance features of SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA. Ben asked me about this advanced test when he committed the advance features of SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA to the XFS OSS tree. To the best of my knowledge, this test has not been submitted as an xfstest so we could not add it then. --Mark Tinguely. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 14:43 ` Mark Tinguely @ 2012-09-18 18:15 ` Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 18:20 ` Eric Sandeen 2012-09-18 18:28 ` Ben Myers 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-09-18 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Tinguely; +Cc: Dave Chinner, linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4, xfs On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS > version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). Hi Mark, Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of the ones in the kernel.org tree)? I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed on that point? Thanks, - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 18:15 ` Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-09-18 18:20 ` Eric Sandeen 2012-09-18 18:28 ` Ben Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2012-09-18 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: Mark Tinguely, linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4, xfs On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS >> version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). > > Hi Mark, > > Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests > tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the > kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of > the ones in the kernel.org tree)? > > I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the > kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed > on that point? That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to ditch the kernel.org repos and let sgi manage a single repo on oss.sgi.com going forward, just to simplify things. We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet I guess. So going forward, stick with the one on oss.sgi.com. Thanks, -Eric > Thanks, > > - Ted > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 18:15 ` Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 18:20 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2012-09-18 18:28 ` Ben Myers 2012-09-18 18:42 ` Theodore Ts'o 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ben Myers @ 2012-09-18 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: Mark Tinguely, Dave Chinner, linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4, xfs Hey Ted, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:15:56PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS > > version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). > > Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests > tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the > kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of > the ones in the kernel.org tree)? The trees on kernel.org are being retired. I'm not sure what Christoph is going to do with the kernel.org repos, but expect new changes to go directly into the xfstests repo on oss.sgi.com. > I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the > kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed > on that point? Your impression is just a few days out of date. See: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html Regards, Ben ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 18:28 ` Ben Myers @ 2012-09-18 18:42 ` Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 19:03 ` Ben Myers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-09-18 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Myers; +Cc: Mark Tinguely, Dave Chinner, linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4, xfs On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests? I'm not subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing list who would if there was a separate mailing list. Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well... - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? 2012-09-18 18:42 ` Theodore Ts'o @ 2012-09-18 19:03 ` Ben Myers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ben Myers @ 2012-09-18 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-ext4, Mark Tinguely, xfs Hey Ted, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html > > On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially > setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests? You might even be the first person to suggest that. ;) > I'm not > subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to > avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox > (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on > the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes > to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are > other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing > list who would if there was a separate mailing list. > > Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I > guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well... I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list. But like you said, xfs@oss.sgi.com isn't extremely high volume. Maybe a filter for xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes? Regards, Ben ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-18 19:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-09-18 2:04 Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 2:29 ` Jie Liu 2012-09-18 6:21 ` Marco Stornelli 2012-09-18 6:40 ` Dave Chinner 2012-09-18 14:43 ` Mark Tinguely 2012-09-18 18:15 ` Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 18:20 ` Eric Sandeen 2012-09-18 18:28 ` Ben Myers 2012-09-18 18:42 ` Theodore Ts'o 2012-09-18 19:03 ` Ben Myers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).