From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:20:15 -0500 Message-ID: <5058BB5F.5050506@sandeen.net> References: <20120918064039.GS11511@dastard> <50588898.6050802@sgi.com> <20120918181556.GC28689@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Tinguely , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from sandeen.net ([63.231.237.45]:42108 "EHLO mail.sandeen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753344Ab2IRSUR (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:20:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120918181556.GC28689@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS >> version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). > > Hi Mark, > > Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests > tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the > kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of > the ones in the kernel.org tree)? > > I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the > kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed > on that point? That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to ditch the kernel.org repos and let sgi manage a single repo on oss.sgi.com going forward, just to simplify things. We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet I guess. So going forward, stick with the one on oss.sgi.com. Thanks, -Eric > Thanks, > > - Ted > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs >