From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mke2fs -O 64bit -E resize=<anything> divides by 0
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:37:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A07D0D.9080101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FF74F654-B6E0-4BF9-A3FC-C2077275B542@dilger.ca>
On 11/11/12 7:54 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2012-11-11, at 3:27 PM, George Spelvin wrote:
>> I'm using v1.43-WIP-2012-09-22-10-g41bf599, last commit Oct. 14.
>>
>> I'm trying to create a file system with 64bit support and specify a
>> maximum resize limit of 64 TiB = 2^34 blocks = 17179869184.
>>
>> (gdb) run -n -t ext4 -O 64bit -E resize=4294967296 /dev/md1
>> Starting program: /root/e2fsprogs/misc/mke2fs -n -t ext4 -O 64bit -E resize=4294967295 /dev/md1
>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
>> mke2fs 1.43-WIP (22-Sep-2012)
>>
>> Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
>> 0x0000000000405f5a in parse_extended_opts (opts=<optimized out>,
>> param=0x64e200) at mke2fs.c:800
>> 800 gdpb = EXT2_DESC_PER_BLOCK(param);
>
> This is definitely a bug in the code to do a divide-by-zero.
>
> However, it should be pointed out that the "resize" option does not
> make sense for filesystems larger than 16TB. The mechanism used for
> resizing beyond 16TB is different and does not need to reserve blocks.
In fairness to the reporter, nothing in the existing ext4 documentation,
AFAICT, mentions this. (but then -O 64bit isn't really documented at all)
And given that the poor reporter is re-making his whole filesystem just
because he found out that he can't grow past 16T:
"(wow, was *that* a nasty surprise)"
it's understandable that he's trying to give it a rather large resize=
value this time around.
This is one of those dark corners of weird behavior that could really use
some formal docs, at least. :(
-Eric
> Cheers, Andreas.
>
>> The issue is that
>>
>> #define EXT2_DESC_PER_BLOCK(s) (EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE(s) / EXT2_DESC_SIZE(s))
>> #define EXT2_DESC_SIZE(s) \
>> ((EXT2_SB(s)->s_feature_incompat & EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT) ? \
>> (s)->s_desc_size : EXT2_MIN_DESC_SIZE)
>>
>> and s_desc_size is 0 because parse_extended_opts is called from PRS which
>> is called very early in main() at line 2320, while s_desc_size is set up
>> in ext2fs_initialize, which is not called from main() until mke2fs.c:2353.
>>
>> As a temporary workaround, I notice that ext2fs_initialize sets s_desc_size to
>> the fixed value EXT2_MIN_DESC_SIZE_64BIT, so I changed the #define as follows:
>>
>> #define EXT2_DESC_SIZE(s) \
>> ((EXT2_SB(s)->s_feature_incompat & EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT) ? \
>> (s)->s_desc_size ?: EXT2_MIN_DESC_SIZE_64BIT : EXT2_MIN_DESC_SIZE)
>>
>> ... which seems to work.
>>
>>
>> (One point that occurred to me while wrestling with this is that the
>> default resize limit of initial size * 1000 should perhaps be clamped
>> to 2^32 if 64bit is not enabled.)
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-12 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-11 22:27 mke2fs -O 64bit -E resize=<anything> divides by 0 George Spelvin
2012-11-12 1:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-11-12 4:32 ` George Spelvin
2012-11-12 4:37 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-11-12 6:32 ` George Spelvin
2012-11-15 15:38 ` George Spelvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A07D0D.9080101@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).